DailyBuzz/Archive12

[[DailyBuzz|—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Peteforsyth (talkcontribs) .

Thursday, 27 December 2007

Monday, 24 December 2007

  • An idea/concept/tool/something that's emerging in the last couple of days can be seen at WikiInterface. It doens't have a good name yet, but check it out? Also see my PersonalPage (TedErnst) and see if it's clear what's intended? TedErnst (talk)

Sunday, 23 December 2007

  • Some of us are tired of Spammers disrespecting our community and propose fighting back with the Spam List where we will put all Spammer's IP address. We could use a three strikes you are out policy. This will be proactive deterrent measure vs. reactive of cleaning up after the offenders. Nobody wants their IP address on AboutUs Spam List, it would not be nice for anyone regestering for any service that requires Internet history check. Igorberger 17:55, 22 December 2007 (PST)

Saturday, 22 December 2007

Friday, 21 December 2007

  • The Lakota Indians just withdrew from all treaties with the United States (via FoxNews.com). It's not showing up on Google News front page. Important news, but something that doesn't directly impact many people. I wonder about Gnews and blogs driving news reporting…it seems to leave big holes just like old media, often in similar places. -Peteforsyth 12:17, 21 December 2007 (PST)
    • Not sure if this is accurate, but I found this map showing the territory possibly in question. - Ray | talk

Thursday, 20 December 2007

Monday, 17 December 2007

Sunday, 16 December 2007

Saturday, 15 December 2007

Thursday, 13 December 2007

  • Google is soon to introduce a new tool called "the knol". Knol means "a unit of knowledge", and the whole thing is supposed to be free articles about general (read: encyclopedic) topics. The authors will be prominently featured, there will be Google ads, and authors will share in the profits. Steven | talk 22:23, 13 December 2007 (PST)
  • My opinion: There has been a lot of blog buzz charting this as a possible competitor to Wikipedia. And at first it seemed quite real, and honestly, quite frightening to me. Google superseding Wikipedia and profiting from its good ideas? But if you read the post carefully, I don't think that, "For many topics, there will likely be competing knols on the same subject." and "...will include the opinions and points of view of the authors" sounds like a competition for a source of reliable information. To get reliable info, students and other people who are looking for "the first thing someone who searches for this topic for the first time will want to read" aren't going to want to read ten different articles to get the full range of opinion on a topic. They want one decent article, and preferably one that isn't subject to an admitted bias. Steven | talk 22:23, 13 December 2007 (PST)
    • I think people who contribute to Wikipedia do so for reasons other than $ and the ability to write a knol and earn $ will not draw too many of them away. Also, wiki folks collaborate to make the best article together, vs. competing to see who can write an article that gets the most votes. That said, I'm sure there are plenty of people in the world who will find it compelling to write an article and put ads on it. Also, I wonder how the interlinking will work between knols. - Ray | talk

Wednesday, 12 December 2007

Tuesday, 11 December 2007

Monday, 10 December 2007

Sunday, 09 December 2007

Thursday, 06 December

Wednesday, 05 December

Tuesday, 04 December

  • A nice description was added to CansForCharity.org, an organization with a simple and powerful mission. Kasey 14:42, 4 December 2007 (PST)
  • New page: OurAdHocWork. The idea is to caputure the ad-hoc work that hasn't yet made it to OurWork. -- Julia & TedErnst (talk) 10:27, 4 December 2007 (PST)

Monday, 03 December

Saturday, 01 December 2007

  • Possibility of still a problem since AboutUs is still licensed different than Wikipedia. --Simon | talk 21:27, 2 December 2007 (PST)
I think that's true, Simon, but at the same time, the reason AboutUs is dual licensed is because of the incompatibilities between GFDL and CC-BY-SA, so if those two licenses are changing to be compatible with each other, perhaps AboutUs can also change to be compatibile with Wikipedia. TedErnst (talk) 08:33, 3 December 2007 (PST)
  • Wikipedia will be moving to GFDL 2.0 (which if agreed by the Wikimedia community will be changed to be crossover with CreativeCommons); but, AboutUs has to stay at GFDL 1.2 per stated in AboutUs copyrights page. AboutUs & Wikipedia will never work together with the current plan. --207.6.253.72 10:23, 3 December 2007 (PST)


Retrieved from "http://aboutus.com/index.php?title=DailyBuzz/Archive12&oldid=14598395"