User talk:MarkDilley
My new strategy - remove comments after responding to them. Hope it works! (thanks to Ward for the idea)
(see history of this page)
Contents
Quote: Why are we not co-owning the domain? (MarkDilley)
Hello Mark, in the meantime I have learned a lot of CommunitySpirit and the CreativeCommons.com :-)
Are you interested to share the domain G CreateConnectCollaborate as G FreeGainSharing?
This means, if you agree, we only need to document it in public, here and at NamePros.com, for which we have a public cooperation agreement with their CEO.
You leave here on CreateConnectCollaborate.com your domain registrar, e.g. Name.com and you get it with 0.00USD (zero) acquisition and transaction costs. As soon as you sell it, we share in public our gain. You have my full initial trust.
fridemar 18:29, 21 September 2009 (PDT) PS.: Mark, you are active on so many channels, that only GoogleSideWiki+Twitter+Facebook+Twitter+... may help to reach you :-) fridemar 17:41, 24 September 2009 (PDT)
Si se pudeo!
Yes, *we can* in the new G WikiNomics era. The people, employed at Google are allowed to use all their Google infrastructure for their personal projects and ventures (one day a week), as long as they do it in accordance with the general business ethics of the employer. CreatingAndSharingWealth is in accordance with AboutUs and beyond. The FreeGainSharing offer (and more to come) goes to all the staff of AboutUs, including RayKing. If no one here helps to build the barn, I would be very sad. fridemar 05:14, 26 September 2009 (PDT)
- I appreciate your urging - I work on the framework that WikiIsSlow - so please keep pinging me and much appreciation for you patience. Best, MarkDilley
Thank you Mark, your appreciation is welcome. What is your problem to not yet accepting the offer? My problem is, that I am now in a waiting state of indefinite duration. The longer the duration, the shorter the time for the recipient of my offer to monetize the domain without the need to incur additional costs. I would be really happy, if you would be the first one to trigger the process of SocialDomaining. To make this practice helpful for people in the developing part of our planet, we need a template transaction and a better understanding of the dynamics behind it.
This offer to you is meant as a template transaction.
For better understanding, I refer you and our readers to the bilinked page: TheTransitioner:Actions. If you answered there, this would increase our WebWeaving effect in another WikiNomics friendly community for building the Commons.
fridemar 18:40, 7 October 2009 (PDT)
Mark, so if you have currently no time left, could you please perhaps forward the offer to one of your peers, preferably to poor, friendly and smart, RealPerson wikizens, ASAP, such that we can use the remaining time as best as possible for peer marketing. Thank you.
fridemar 20:28, 9 October 2009 (PDT)
Mark, you might wish to have a look at my engagement in SideWiki:WealthWiki.net .
fridemar 17:37, 10 October 2009 (PDT)
Wiki index question
Hi Mark, one of my last questions went unnoticed. For easier tracking and amplifying each others engagement, I left a notice on GoogleSideWiki. Hey, it even got an RT at Twitter from Aaron. You get one too for your answer :-)
Freeofferspot admin has returned to his old sneaky scam methods
Remember a couple months ago where we had a dispute regarding the freeofferspot page and the freeofferspotscam.blogspot page? Well, after you settled the dispute and the pages were written to what we all agreed upon, the the admin of Free Offer Spot has gone back to changing it. He didn't only change his page, but the other page I set up as well. He modified my page to redirect to another page he set up. He changed it about 2 months, and although I noticed it within a day after he changed it, I left it untouched thinking you might do something about it and perhaps ban that user for abusing your instructions. However, nothing like that happened, so I took the liberty to revert back to the way it was agreed upon back a couple months.
As I warned you back a couple of months, this the admin of Free Offer Spot is a very devious individual who would do ANYTHING and EVERYTHING they can to block what his scam sites are about. I'm doing the right thing and letting people know that. He doesn't like it and will just block it. Please respect the changes made and leave it as it is. Maybe you can even lock the pages so the user cannot modify it ever in the future and cause more conflict. Thanks.
I am simply defending my own website aboutus page from lies. It should not be run by a libeling competitor, that is spreading false lies without one shred of proof! His claims are false and should not be allowed on the aboutus site. This site is about telling truth, and his claims have no ptruth. His website is the one that is scamming users, that I can PROVE!
All the claims made are factual and proof given. For example, take a look at what I mentioned about the user above. I said and proved the user would do anything to cover up the truth, not only on here but on the freeofferspot scam site. Turns out it is true, and Mark Dilley can see it for himself. If it is something that you continue to ignore, you need to stop speculating and making false accusations.
Perhaps you want to refresh your knowledge of what AboutUs and what a WikiWiki is? It is about how users can contribute and mention the truth about a site. Like it or not, it is the truth. If AboutUs decides to block such truth, then this wiki isn't what it is supposed to be... it becomes just another self-promo site.
All you've proven is that I removed your lies from my page. You cannot prove anything you've said on your libel blog. What a joke. Everything you claim my site says/does is false. Let's take a look. You claim F.O.S. says they are the freebie site, but on the site it clearly says it's NOT and that it is ONLY a guide to freebie sites. You also claim we say we were on the news, but we never said that. Who cares the we used a video with news clips that also had a watermark with a link. The video description (before you falsely reported it) explained that it covered the original gratis internet site (not fos). Does that prove this site is a scam? NO. You my friend are a liar.
AboutUs was not created for unethical competitor's to broadcast defamatory information. Unless you can provide real proof of your claims, you really have nothing. The truth is, you are a lying competitor out to defame my website. Anyone can post crap on a page about how it's a scam. And anyone can post that it's not a scam and remove the text that is lying. It's all about proof. AbuotUs isn't about posting undocumented crap...
=
how are you
Yay
I picked How to change CamelCaseCapitalization and UpdateThumbnail. PS: used a neat trick to mask email address for filtering :-) Looky --Sa'ad ( msg me•email•chat ) 00:39, 1 December 2009 (PST)
me gustaria encontrar personas para pasamela muy bien
rawr.
You already know who it is cause of the title, huh? Yeah. How unoriginal. >_>.
So I was thinking of an idea that is a bit common with wikis. The front page of many wikis have a random fact list. What do you think about daily random facts about random websites that have pages here? And of course, spotlighted pages get featured in the random facts listing more?
Thank you for your help Asad
Thank you for your help with editing Asad.
Alex
Asking for recovering svg format
Dear Mark,
- .svg is a W3C recommended picture format that saves enormous space, is fast and supported by all modern browsers. As I have uploaded a lot of steno-glyphs and did a lot of work to build a community for stenographic gestures (this year is the year of tablet pcs), I ask you in the interest of all parties to allow svg format again. (It's a matter of a minute to allow it in the config file for the MediaEngine, such that we are not annoyed by the current error message.
File format not supported
There was a problem uploading the image.
Please help.
-- fridemar 17:48, 3 February 2010 (PST)