Difference between revisions of "Open Collaboration"
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (my thoughsts) |
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) m (fix name link) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Discussion:== | ==Discussion:== | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[fridemar]] - I like the introduction of the open in front of collaboration, I don't think that the link here adds any value yet. ~~ [[MarkDilley]] |
Revision as of 12:44, 10 November 2007
From WhoWeAre#Mission
People, who love the light of the general public consciousness, have good reasons to open up as many of their activities as possible.
As collaboration may be highly valued, even in criminal or terroristic organizations, collaboration might be a "way of life" for these groups too.
Open collaboration of terroristic activities are doomed to "diminish into thin air", due to the power of the majority of internet people, which are good-natured. Aren't we? ;-)
fridemar 04:10, 10 November 2007 (PST)
Discussion:
fridemar - I like the introduction of the open in front of collaboration, I don't think that the link here adds any value yet. ~~ MarkDilley
