Difference between revisions of "Create Community Reviews Guidelines"

OurWork (??) Create Community Reviews Guidelines (Lead?)

OLDOLD

Working on this

KristinaWeis, Kasey, Ted

Description

Description:

This is the page that we will be linking users to: Community Reviews Guidelines

Why?

Business Reason: AboutUs is a place for community reviews, but not libel.

Done When

>

Useful Links

• CommunityReview
• NegativeReviews
• CommunityWork- this page is the overall scope for community work and examples
• CommunityWorkInitialDefinition- seems to be the project page for the above link

Template:Review

Discussion

>

• Examples: Category:Reviews Need Patrolling
• Also, previous page more related to formatting with some guidelines is CommunityReviewsFormatting. KristinaWeis 16:27, 4 September 2007 (PDT)

• ...

anonymous reviews especially the glowing and the scathing seem suspect and the latter vindictive. These also seem utterly useless with no name, location, time- like they just dropped in from the ether?

A logged in user would be great, a name with an IP and name and date.... Obviously, signing with your user name would be ideal, but a name or email address is pretty good as well.

• I queston how useful, any anonymous reviews are. Kasey 12:47, 19 October 2007 (PDT)

Would not allowing unsigned or anonymous reviews be unwiki?

Are unsigned reviews (IPs with a name are fine) even helpful? Are these reviews real?

Task Lead

• Task Lead:

Resource Estimate

• Pair Days:

Evaluator

• Evaluator:

Task Evaluation

• How the task went:
• Sign off Person:
• Sign off Date: