Difference between revisions of "FeatureMePotentials:UnderDiscussion:R-T"

R-T

Nurturing this group: Asad Butt and Obed Suhail and you (add your name here)

SoftPress.com featured discussion

• Edit/Add to this Discussion
• First nominated on 11:05, 4 January 2008 (PST)
• Redirected Article to its relevant domain page.
• I'd been in contact via email with Ian Schray (who created this page) over the past week or so. Some of the thoughts for improvement I mentioned to him are:

* This a pretty decent page about the products, but doesn't really say much about the company. I like to think that the "AboutUs" page should include some info about the company, even if it's just a quick paragraph: "Founded in BLAH-BLAH-BLAH, Softpress has offices in YADA-YADA." (Maybe something on Intaglio too. Are there other products Softpress offers?)

* Fuller product descriptions, probably including pricing, and a link to the respective product pages for more info. 

* Maybe in addition to the Pro v. Express list (which is a good start), there can be some sort of paragraph explaining which version suits what type of people or needs. The price difference between the two is so huge, I for one as a potential customer think for $90 download I might take a chance on the Express ('cause I really hate GoLive and have never fallen in love with Dreamweaver), but if that one feature I need is going to cost me $250 for the Pro, I'm more likely to want to play with Dreamweaver for the price, just because it's got the street cred.

* On that note, maybe even a "why this is better than the competition" section wouldn't be a bad thing. Somewhere on the Softpress website I read one advantage was the "clean code" generation over other WYSIWYG editors that keep the old code. That was a serious sales point for me (although now I can't find where I read that).

* Customer testimonials (if you have them). Even just a link to them on an external site goes a long ways.

These were just my thoughts, but figured I'd let everyone see what I'd been thinking/mentioned to him as suggested edits. -- TakKendrick | talk 16:40, 8 January 2008 (PST)

• Moving to LastChance today after no work on the page in quite some time. Please edit this discussion and/or the page to make the nomination active again. Asad | *~talk~* 04:17, 29 February 2008 (PST)

SuttleMusicOnline.com featured discussion

• Edit/Add to this Discussion
• First nominated on 14:37, 27 October 2007 (PDT)
• This page looks good and will become a stronger candidate with some contact information and an address. Obed Suhail 02:47, 10 November 2007 (PST)

• Seems as if someone added contact information and email address. I like this article I think it is almost ready to be Featured. but it needs further editing, the writing above is just too overpowering and repititious. Repeating the Suttle name is annoying and takes away from the article itself. also no need to have the history of the Suttle person. A click on the link will bring all that to life. I am going to copyedit this tomorrow.Patty42 20:11, 28 November 2007 (PST)

• I did a full copyedit and removed excess picture. Article is now ready to be featured. Done done Patty42 08:13, 29 November 2007 (PST)

• One thing I really loved is the "Suttle's Music" section, with the music samples. That really makes the difference on this page. And I think the page is ready to rock and roll ;) Cle Silva 14:16, 20 February 2008 (PST)
• Did some page formatting. Removed another picture that was confusing. --Sa'ad ^{: msg me : email :} 21:48, 20 February 2008 (PST)

Tanzanite-Gemstone.com featured discussion

• Edit/Add to this Discussion
• Added to nomination process on 6 June 2007, from an old nomination that hadn't been processed.
• This certainly is coming along nicely. A lot of information. I wonder about how to maybe infuse some graphical elements into the WikiPage though. Pictures of the gemstones perhaps? Or just the website logo? I just think a few images would polish this up nicely. -- TakKendrick 15:43, 6 June 2007 (PDT)
• The page looks nice but it still needs some graphical elements, as Tak mentioned above. Right now there doesn't seem to be much activity going on there. Asad | *~talk~* 20:29, 10 October 2007 (PDT)
• I liked this page - good, detailed information provided here on Tanzanite which is very useful. I also found http://www.lapigems.com and Tanzanite.com to be good sources.
• More work was done on this page in November and it looks pretty good now. I'm moving it from Last Chance to Under Discussion section for now. Obed Suhail 06:00, 27 December 2007 (PST)
• Moving to LastChance today after no work on the page in quite some time. Please edit this discussion and/or the page to make the nomination active again. Asad | *~talk~* 04:17, 29 February 2008 (PST)

TazStar.com featured discussion

• Edit/Add to this Discussion
• Nomination process on 2-Oct-2007, after being nominated a few weeks ago.
• The page looks great but there are a couple of things that might be done to improve it further. The first thing that strikes me here is that there is no contact information on this page. Also, it will be great, if we can have an image or two of the product itself on this page. Asad | *~talk~* 06:00, 16 October 2007 (PDT)
• Good to see the product images added to this page. It's much further along now, but there's still no contact information or address on this page. The related domains section could be worked on too. Asad | *~talk~* 21:05, 21 November 2007 (PST)
• I agree with Asad. Great page. With contact info, I think it's good to go. TedErnst (talk) 16:39, 19 February 2008 (PST)
• I edited some sections and replaced a (not much attractive) picture by a better one (in my opinion). Just revert the changes if you don't like it. Also, I agree that since it's a commercial page, it needs at least a phone number for contact. I felt very tempted to place the toll free number they have on their site, but I was affraid they wouldn't agree with that. I liked the image gallery, however the images are lacking some description. Cle Silva 02:34, 21 February 2008 (PST)
• After Cle's comments, I now see how much better this page could be with just a little more work one product descriptions (and even links to the pages for those products on your site?), plus the contact info, of course. TedErnst (talk) 08:27, 21 February 2008 (PST)

ThaiDye.com featured discussion

• Edit/Add to this Discussion
• First nominated on 01:38, 8 June 2007 (PDT)
• Good use of images to bring your page to life! The jacket looks great. I would consider adding a gallery of images. For more information on how to do this, contact us on IRC chat or see recent featured pages. Adding customer testimonials and community reviews can also really improve the quality of a page. I think the Description section could also use some more information: how are the clothes made? where are they primarily sold? where are they made? You're off to a great start. Keep up the good work. -- Blake Hinckley 14:56, 28 June 2007 (PDT)
• Webmaster was emailed today to see if they're interested in working more on this page. Obed Suhail 23:21, 27 September 2007 (PDT)
• Thank your for that email - was glad to oblige and added info on mudmee tie-dye.
• Sorry for responding so late. Would you still be interested in working on this page? I think it would be great to have a product gallery on this page, and maybe a testimonials section, and some layout tweaks. The images on this page right now are great but maybe they can be a bit smaller? Asad | *~talk~* 03:12, 9 January 2008 (PST)
• Moving to LastChance today after no work on the page in quite some time. Please edit this discussion and/or the page to make the nomination active again. Asad | *~talk~* 04:17, 29 February 2008 (PST)

SiteHoppin.com featured discussion

• Edit/Add to this Discussion
• First nominated on 14:34, 15 January 2008 (PST)

Snaptease.com featured discussion

• Edit/Add to this Discussion
• First nominated on 15:07, 13 January 2008 (PST)

RumblingLankan.com featured discussion

• Edit/Add to this Discussion
• First nominated on 20:37, 12 January 2008 (PST)