Difference between revisions of "FeatureMePotentials:ReadyForFeaturing"

(Pages ready for featuring: formatting)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
== Pages ready for featuring ==
 
== Pages ready for featuring ==
 +
<ol>
 
=== A third person agrees ===</noinclude>
 
=== A third person agrees ===</noinclude>
<ol><li> '''[[BoredGames.co.uk]]''' </li><noinclude>
+
<li> '''[[BoredGames.co.uk]]''' </li><noinclude>
 
* [[User:Saad Saeed|Saad]] 14:10, 19 February 2008 (PST)
 
* [[User:Saad Saeed|Saad]] 14:10, 19 February 2008 (PST)
 
* [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] <small>([[User talk:TedErnst|talk]])</small> 16:55, 19 February 2008 (PST)
 
* [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] <small>([[User talk:TedErnst|talk]])</small> 16:55, 19 February 2008 (PST)
Line 22: Line 23:
 
* [[Tak]] 14:10, 19 February 2008 (PST)
 
* [[Tak]] 14:10, 19 February 2008 (PST)
 
</ol>
 
</ol>
 +
 
== Discussion leading to the creation of this page ==
 
== Discussion leading to the creation of this page ==
 
We have always wanted decisions about which pages are ready to feature to be a public decision, made by the community.  We could make a list of pages that anyone believes are ready.  Anyone may add a new page to the bottom of that list.  Anyone may add their name to any page on the list.  The list is ordered by number of names saying it's ready by most names to least, and we feature from the top.
 
We have always wanted decisions about which pages are ready to feature to be a public decision, made by the community.  We could make a list of pages that anyone believes are ready.  Anyone may add a new page to the bottom of that list.  Anyone may add their name to any page on the list.  The list is ordered by number of names saying it's ready by most names to least, and we feature from the top.

Revision as of 06:46, 20 February 2008

This is a list (with multiple sub-lists) of pages that at least one community member says are ready for featuring. The more people say it's ready, the more likely it is to actually be featured. It's a kind of a never-ending election where winners are simply removed from time to time and the rest keep going. Template:clearleft

Instructions

  1. Take a look at the Recently Nominated and/or Under Discussion pages. If you find one that you believe is ready to be featured, add it to the Someone says it's ready list below. Please add pages to the bottom of the list, with your name and date on the next line.
  2. If you agree that a page on any of these lists is ready, please put your name on a new line and move that entry to the bottom of the next list up the page.
  3. If you need help, please ContactUs or see TedErnst (talk) for help.

Pages ready for featuring

    A third person agrees

  1. BoredGames.co.uk
  2. A second person agrees

  3. SuttleMusicOnline.com
    • Obed 14:10, 19 February 2008 (PST)
    • TedErnst (talk) 16:46, 19 February 2008 (PST)

    Someone says it's ready

  4. TazStar.com
    • Tak 14:10, 19 February 2008 (PST)

Discussion leading to the creation of this page

We have always wanted decisions about which pages are ready to feature to be a public decision, made by the community. We could make a list of pages that anyone believes are ready. Anyone may add a new page to the bottom of that list. Anyone may add their name to any page on the list. The list is ordered by number of names saying it's ready by most names to least, and we feature from the top.

Comments:
That looks like the poll I was suggesting before. -- Cle
Yes, definitely, this is like the poll you were suggesting. I think the poll is a great idea. And if it can be more fluid (we only have to have a winner at the moment when a new feature is put up, and previous yes votes carry forward, and everyone can vote for as many as they like), then I think it really works in the wiki. TedErnst (talk)


Retrieved from "http://aboutus.com/index.php?title=FeatureMePotentials:ReadyForFeaturing&oldid=14846501"