Difference between revisions of "Category:ErrorLog"

(Google caching issue: response from AboutUs staff)
(Google caching issue: another thought)
Line 170: Line 170:
  
 
: ''I work for [[AboutUs]].  I'm on the community side and not the dev side.  I wonder if removing the adult flag for a couple of weeks would allow google to catch up?  And the put the flag back?  We can also work with dev for a longer term solution, but does this work as temp solution, something we can work on with the tools we (non-dev) have? [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 08:00, 5 November 2007 (PST)
 
: ''I work for [[AboutUs]].  I'm on the community side and not the dev side.  I wonder if removing the adult flag for a couple of weeks would allow google to catch up?  And the put the flag back?  We can also work with dev for a longer term solution, but does this work as temp solution, something we can work on with the tools we (non-dev) have? [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 08:00, 5 November 2007 (PST)
 +
 +
: ''Another solution that just occurred to me.  Brian, if you now have your robots.txt set up to exclude the [[AboutUsBot]], we could simply delete the pages for your domains, then in a couple of weeks once Google has seen the deletions, we could have our bot re-create the [[NoBot]] version of the pages.  The only trick would be if they were re-created and again flagged as adult before google caught up.  This possibility for re-flagging by the community exists with my first proposal above as well, but might be less likely with this second one, since the pages wouldn't actually exist.  Thoughts? [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 08:11, 5 November 2007 (PST)
  
 
== spam filtering ==
 
== spam filtering ==

Revision as of 16:11, 5 November 2007

Also see BugSquashing and FireFighting

This category currently contains no pages or media.