Difference between revisions of "Human Resource Software/FeatureDiscussion"
TakKendrick (talk | contribs) |
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (good work here.) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* <span class="plainlinks">[http://www.aboutus.org/index.php?title=Human_Resource_Software/FeatureDiscussion&action=edit Edit/Add to this Discussion]</span> | * <span class="plainlinks">[http://www.aboutus.org/index.php?title=Human_Resource_Software/FeatureDiscussion&action=edit Edit/Add to this Discussion]</span> | ||
* Nomination processed on 26 Sept. 2007 (after a nomination from a few weeks ago that had slipped through the cracks). | * Nomination processed on 26 Sept. 2007 (after a nomination from a few weeks ago that had slipped through the cracks). | ||
+ | * [[USer:Ipoeng|Ipoeng]] - WOW, nice work here. Couple of ideas - break free from our original page titles, like ''title'' and ''discription'' - you have those there, feels redundant to keep the names. Maybe you want to upload the images so that you can move them around the page more, just an idea. Also, maybe you want to use [[RightTOC]]. Overall, I am very impressed how you built your reputation within the context of great information. Let me know if you have any thoughts. Best, [[MarkDilley]] |
Revision as of 05:35, 27 September 2007
[[Human Resource Software|]]
Human Resource Software featured discussion
- Edit/Add to this Discussion
- Nomination processed on 26 Sept. 2007 (after a nomination from a few weeks ago that had slipped through the cracks).
- Ipoeng - WOW, nice work here. Couple of ideas - break free from our original page titles, like title and discription - you have those there, feels redundant to keep the names. Maybe you want to upload the images so that you can move them around the page more, just an idea. Also, maybe you want to use RightTOC. Overall, I am very impressed how you built your reputation within the context of great information. Let me know if you have any thoughts. Best, MarkDilley