LASIK1st:Status/ChrisBabson
YES
- I think viable cities are Portland, Manhattan (if this counts), and Chicago . The former is preferable since we've already garnered sponsorships there and this is part of how 'complete' a page may be. The only downside (or potential upside) is Portland's small size. This would make the page more focused, but less indicative of a larger city page.
- I also think keyword search might be a good idea, as far as visibility is concerned. If this is the case, it looks like LASIK New York City might be the one to focus on (and we could build it out as a combination of LASIK Manhattan and the other burrows).
FINAL NOTES: LASIK Dallas looks great! I only have a couple of notes before I am at yes, and these need not be followed if we all agree they are unnecessary:
- Equipment on the listing page needs to follow site uniformity. Example: at the top of the list, VISX CustomVue is a type of procedure while VISX Star S4 is a type of laser. Only the latter is appropriate here, although it will link to the VISX CustomVue page. These small inaccuracies/redundancies should be eliminated anywhere they occur.
- Images on individual provider pages should be in galleries. Everything looks pretty good now, but I think a slight improvement might be moving all images into galleries. This will help with any resizing issues and with general format.
- Alternating highlights in background. I see that the purpose here is to separate the listing visually, but this will be very confusing once we have sponsors. If you look at the LASIK:Portland page you'll see what I mean: the colored cells are being used to indicate sponsorship. Perhaps the organizational benefits to alternating colors outweigh the costs here, but if that's the case I'd like some other ideas on how to separate the sponsors effectively.
Almost ready for Yes:
- As soon as all images are in galleries we are good to go!
Great work guys!
