AdultContentPolicyNotes
25-Apr-2007
Notes from meeting: we have decided to continue with the process of Consensus Polling.
Is illegal content adult content a subset? Should we deal with illegal now or later?
John thinks ALL porn is illegal.
Which should we tackle first??
Should we create a second page for Illegal Content?
We have decided to created a second page for illegal content.
Brandon concerned about Adult Content- mom, relatives, et al.
Johns's wife encountered porn on the site; she belives it is wrong. He is concerned about reputation, of his job choice, and of the company. Ray has some questions about the details.
Tak's concern is the opposite of John's concern- free speech, friends who like porn, are involved in porn.
Where is the line.
Porn is NOT our focus.
Chris- does not think that we are a 'porn' site, we include but we are not defined by it.
Thumbnails- do we keep them, what is the line: sexual suggestiveness, nudity...
Isabel- What about the descriptions of the pages: they are often very explicit, chock full of references to, ahem, body parts.
no thumbnails include but not facilitate no links to these pages? but would it be useful if we did not have links- would we just be filling the internet with noise?
Tak- if we've edited a page, then we acknowledge the content of the page.
Vinh- what about tweaking the user preferences so that they could choose to see the thumbnails, one step further then the walled garden.
Tak-