Reba-Curtis.com
Revision as of 17:16, 18 April 2008 by Kasey (talk | contribs) (Reverted edits by 84.104.5.167 (Talk); changed back to last version by 76.0.146.25)
There appears to be a pattern of deletion of people's comments in this section. This is an area for our community to state their concerns, and for site owners to constructively address them. Please keep in mind:
- Make only constructive and non-libelous contributions.
- Don't delete other people's comments. If you think they are libelous or non-constructive, please contact AboutUs.
- If you feel someone has written something that is inaccurate, please feel free to respond.
- Anonymous comments carry less weight and are more likely to be deleted by AboutUs if they look non-constructive or repetitive; to maximize your voice and credibility, login and use you real name when you make a comment.
Title
Description
Comment
- I am Reba Curtis and I don't appreciate this site supporting, by listing, this abusive website writer. Internet laws should clearly forbid using one's name for such scandelous and liable internet sites. This site should develop standards which prohibit such listings!!!!
Again I am Reba Curtis. Mr. Bruynder dedicated a liable and scandelous site about breeding dogs to my personal name and I have nothing to do with all his affairs all over the world. The liable website should not exist, I am disappointed it is even listed by Wiki. In any regard an internet abuser should not be allowed to then continue more liable rantings on this site through comments. The comments should be monitored and deleted. This site is supposed to be about the website it is featuring. The website featured here is not about me as is indicated in the name but about all Mr. Bruynder's troubles in dog breeding. Therefore, if Wiki were reporting truth, then this text will remain and serve as an example of internet abuse and the need to establish rules and regulations to prohibit same. I wish this listing could be deleted because of abuse, but if you insist to leave it up for the world as a reference, then my editorials need serious recognition as well for it is a website in my name.
As another topic of conversation, Wiki is dependent on its users to provide information to their database. People all over the world refer to Wiki as if its comments and reports are factual when they are only the contribution of the user and are not verified as fact. What is the purpose of this site if you can't trust the comments approved?
Additional Information
Community Reviews
Related Domains
External Links