User talk:RandyPenn

Hello and welcome to the AboutUs wiki Randy! Check out the welcome page and ask me any questions you may have. Also, would you be interested in working on the peace category with me? Best, MarkDilley, leave messages here

Hi Randy, a FYI, I reverted the edits you made to MTV cateogies. Although I agree many of those items should be highlighted... check out the Internal Linking Guide and let me know if you have any questions. Best, MarkDilley, leave messages here

I did not like that you reverted to the idiotic robot build on MovieTV.com. Please put it back the way I had it. The catagories were quite well done as well as the related websites. Now you destroyed all the work I did to find the related catagories and add the sites.

Through the history tab [1] you can easily revert to your last version. no worries, it is wiki. Let me know if you have any questions.. Best, MarkDilley, leave messages here

Cool, glad that worked, I just made a mistake. I think it had something to do with the ALL CAPS stuff. MarkDilley, leave messages here

Geocities, dnstoys, google, securepaynet.net do not have anything to do with movietv.com or its catagories.

Why revert to catagories like

comment I want to see flim scount ????

You put it back.

Help with peace catagory? What does it entail? I have extreme POV on that issue and those people.

Yea, I jumped the gun on asking you, doesn't seem like your style, sorry, MarkDilley, leave messages here

When I learn all the facets of this interface and the edit tags I might be of some help. As a rabid anarchist it may or may not be suitable for peace catagory it depends on what the goal is. A question: you reverted to the original robot gumbo - why didnt you just edit it? I saw the restriction on 20 related domains. Yet the relationship of "related domains" is not explained. I put up what I see as related in the batch of domains - yet they are related to the tv and to the site family. Is it related to a family of owned sites or related to the whole of the entity? Reverting to the original which had so many bad errors in these fields gave me a bad flag instead of a heads up. I guess I have to understand what the "editors" here do?