Difference between revisions of "SocialDeviancy.com/FeatureDiscussion"
TakKendrick (talk | contribs) |
m (→SocialDeviancy.com featured discussion) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* Added to nomination process on 5 June 2007, from an old nomination that hadn't been processed. | * Added to nomination process on 5 June 2007, from an old nomination that hadn't been processed. | ||
* I for one, love that this page was nominated, in part because of the question it raises. Although the website is not pornographic in nature, it does carry and "adult" warning due to content, and I wonder whether it's appropriate to spotlight this kind of website given that [[AboutUs]] is a resource for some younger people as well as those who might be more conservative that this website might offend. While I don't personally have a problem with this stuff (and am pleased that such issues are address on the internet), is this something the [[AboutUs]] community feels should be spotlighted? -- [[Image:TakCaricatureSm.jpg|20px]] [[TakKendrick]] | [[User Talk:TakKendrick|Talk]] | * I for one, love that this page was nominated, in part because of the question it raises. Although the website is not pornographic in nature, it does carry and "adult" warning due to content, and I wonder whether it's appropriate to spotlight this kind of website given that [[AboutUs]] is a resource for some younger people as well as those who might be more conservative that this website might offend. While I don't personally have a problem with this stuff (and am pleased that such issues are address on the internet), is this something the [[AboutUs]] community feels should be spotlighted? -- [[Image:TakCaricatureSm.jpg|20px]] [[TakKendrick]] | [[User Talk:TakKendrick|Talk]] | ||
| + | * Was this question ever resolved, Tak? It seems like an unusual amount of site for a nomination to sit idle without any resolution at all. Did the submission happen to slip through the cracks again? =( - [[User:Vaelor|Vaelor]] 23:29, 12 July 2007 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 06:29, 13 July 2007
[[SocialDeviancy.com|]]
SocialDeviancy.com featured discussion
- Edit/Add to this Discussion
- Added to nomination process on 5 June 2007, from an old nomination that hadn't been processed.
- I for one, love that this page was nominated, in part because of the question it raises. Although the website is not pornographic in nature, it does carry and "adult" warning due to content, and I wonder whether it's appropriate to spotlight this kind of website given that AboutUs is a resource for some younger people as well as those who might be more conservative that this website might offend. While I don't personally have a problem with this stuff (and am pleased that such issues are address on the internet), is this something the AboutUs community feels should be spotlighted? --
TakKendrick | Talk - Was this question ever resolved, Tak? It seems like an unusual amount of site for a nomination to sit idle without any resolution at all. Did the submission happen to slip through the cracks again? =( - Vaelor 23:29, 12 July 2007 (PDT)
