Difference between revisions of "TwittiWikker"
PeterMerel (talk | contribs) (... is to Wiki as Twitter is to Blogs ...) |
PeterMerel (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
So [[Twitter]] seemed to get traction partly as a cult and partly as a shared public blackboard for other web apps. But Twitter is like a stack, right? Doesn't make much of a blackboard ... and, well, Wiki is more like an incestuous hash - lots of objects with references to each other. So ... | So [[Twitter]] seemed to get traction partly as a cult and partly as a shared public blackboard for other web apps. But Twitter is like a stack, right? Doesn't make much of a blackboard ... and, well, Wiki is more like an incestuous hash - lots of objects with references to each other. So ... | ||
| − | Let's consider a wiki whose pages can contain nothing but | + | Let's consider a wiki whose pages can contain nothing but one sentence. In order to say something subtantial, [[People]] [[Would]] [[Use]] [[WikiWords]] [[For Almost Everything]]. Which would more incestuously intertwingle the content than ever before. Participants would have no choice but to continuously refactor. The meanings of some text would stabilize while others would oscillate or flutter chaotically ... |
| − | |||
| − | In order to say something subtantial, [[People]] [[Would]] [[Use]] [[WikiWords]] [[For Almost Everything]]. Which would more incestuously intertwingle the content than ever before. Participants would have no choice but to continuously refactor. The meanings of some text would stabilize while others would oscillate or flutter chaotically ... | ||
Just [[Thinking Out Loud]]. Hey that'd be a better wikiname for this than TwittiWikker ... | Just [[Thinking Out Loud]]. Hey that'd be a better wikiname for this than TwittiWikker ... | ||
Okay, you pile on the VC and I'll start hiring ex-googlers ;) | Okay, you pile on the VC and I'll start hiring ex-googlers ;) | ||
Revision as of 16:18, 8 June 2007
An idea for an engaging AboutUs WikiProcess. Maybe already been done?
So Twitter seemed to get traction partly as a cult and partly as a shared public blackboard for other web apps. But Twitter is like a stack, right? Doesn't make much of a blackboard ... and, well, Wiki is more like an incestuous hash - lots of objects with references to each other. So ...
Let's consider a wiki whose pages can contain nothing but one sentence. In order to say something subtantial, People Would Use WikiWords For Almost Everything. Which would more incestuously intertwingle the content than ever before. Participants would have no choice but to continuously refactor. The meanings of some text would stabilize while others would oscillate or flutter chaotically ...
Just Thinking Out Loud. Hey that'd be a better wikiname for this than TwittiWikker ...
Okay, you pile on the VC and I'll start hiring ex-googlers ;)
