Difference between revisions of "Constructive Edits"
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
** If you state a fact that might be controversial, reference it to clear up any confusion. | ** If you state a fact that might be controversial, reference it to clear up any confusion. | ||
*Share opinions in the "reviews" section. | *Share opinions in the "reviews" section. | ||
| − | + | Also, see our [[Portal:AboutUsPolicy/Editing|editing]] policies or the [[Help]] section. | |
| − | Constructive edits can also enter into the realm of clarifying or reorganizing. This is also very important work to do because there is so much information to read that less is most often more. Reading various comments and summarizing them into a more concise presentation of the information takes time, but readers appreciate it. [[Wiki]] technology does this very well, anyone reading an article is welcome to reorganize, add to, subtract from or otherwise improve the text. The more people read it, the better it gets - like polishing a pearl. | + | Constructive edits can also enter into the realm of clarifying or reorganizing, leading to [[self organization]]. This is also very important work to do because there is so much information to read that less is most often more. Reading various comments and summarizing them into a more concise presentation of the information takes time, but readers appreciate it. [[Wiki]] technology does this very well, anyone reading an article is welcome to reorganize, add to, subtract from or otherwise improve the text. The more people read it, the better it gets - like polishing a pearl. |
Revision as of 18:04, 30 March 2007
All constructive edits are welcome. We depend on visitors to share their knowledge.The concept of making constructive edits goes along with the fact that we Assume Good Faith. We believe that everyone who makes an edit or creates a page is doing so to provide informative, educational and accurate information.
Any edit should always be able to answer "Yes!" to the question: "Does this edit make it better for the next reader?"
Some examples of constructive edits include:
- Better describe the website on its AboutUs page.
- Mention something interesting about the site that others might not know.
- Define a term so it can be referenced by many pages.
Of course,
- Don't write anything untrue.
- If you state a fact that might be controversial, reference it to clear up any confusion.
- Share opinions in the "reviews" section.
Also, see our editing policies or the Help section.
Constructive edits can also enter into the realm of clarifying or reorganizing, leading to self organization. This is also very important work to do because there is so much information to read that less is most often more. Reading various comments and summarizing them into a more concise presentation of the information takes time, but readers appreciate it. Wiki technology does this very well, anyone reading an article is welcome to reorganize, add to, subtract from or otherwise improve the text. The more people read it, the better it gets - like polishing a pearl.