Difference between revisions of "Add Peer Reviewer User Group"
John Stanton (talk | contribs) |
(→'''Discussion''': deletion power?) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Just clarifying what this means. Is this to allow people to use [[uberpatrol]] and manually patrol edits, without any other admin powers? [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 15:50, 17 November 2007 (PST) | Just clarifying what this means. Is this to allow people to use [[uberpatrol]] and manually patrol edits, without any other admin powers? [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 15:50, 17 November 2007 (PST) | ||
::Initially this would allow normal patrolling the old fashioned way. I suspect it is a minor tweek to allow access to Uber Patrol -BUT- Uber Patrol is not yet ready for prime time and I personally would not release it to a larger group until the multiuser issues have been fully addressed and the UI has been worked over. Public Release of Uber Patrol should be a high priority and at least 1 Dev person should be assigned to fix and launch it IMHO [[User:John Stanton|John]] 19:29, 17 November 2007 (PST) | ::Initially this would allow normal patrolling the old fashioned way. I suspect it is a minor tweek to allow access to Uber Patrol -BUT- Uber Patrol is not yet ready for prime time and I personally would not release it to a larger group until the multiuser issues have been fully addressed and the UI has been worked over. Public Release of Uber Patrol should be a high priority and at least 1 Dev person should be assigned to fix and launch it IMHO [[User:John Stanton|John]] 19:29, 17 November 2007 (PST) | ||
| + | I'm inclined to agree with Simon that the power to delete might be too much for this group. What do you think, John? [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] <small>([[User talk:TedErnst|talk]])</small> 15:22, 19 November 2007 (PST) | ||
=='''Task Lead'''== | =='''Task Lead'''== | ||
Revision as of 23:22, 19 November 2007
back to OurWork , Operations Tasks Project:
Header Info
(4hrs)
Description
Description: Add a new user group for external peer reviewers with patroller permissions
Why?
Business Reason: Allow external community members to do peer reviewing
Done When
Permissions are established
Useful Links
>
Discussion
Just clarifying what this means. Is this to allow people to use uberpatrol and manually patrol edits, without any other admin powers? TedErnst | talk 15:50, 17 November 2007 (PST)
- Initially this would allow normal patrolling the old fashioned way. I suspect it is a minor tweek to allow access to Uber Patrol -BUT- Uber Patrol is not yet ready for prime time and I personally would not release it to a larger group until the multiuser issues have been fully addressed and the UI has been worked over. Public Release of Uber Patrol should be a high priority and at least 1 Dev person should be assigned to fix and launch it IMHO John 19:29, 17 November 2007 (PST)
I'm inclined to agree with Simon that the power to delete might be too much for this group. What do you think, John? TedErnst (talk) 15:22, 19 November 2007 (PST)
Task Lead
- Task Lead: John
Resource Estimate
- Hours: 4hrs
Evaluator
- Evaluator: Tak
Task Evaluation
- How the task went:
- Sign off Person:
- Sign off Date:
