Difference between revisions of "Distributed Planning Game:Status"
Obed Suhail (talk | contribs) |
Obed Suhail (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Status: {{NotYet}} == | ==Status: {{NotYet}} == | ||
| − | * We have {{BelowThreshold| | + | * We have {{BelowThreshold|57%}} (4) YES of {{BelowThreshold|7}} [[AboutUsStaff|Staff]] |
<div style="background:#EEFFDF;"> | <div style="background:#EEFFDF;"> | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
===Staff=== | ===Staff=== | ||
<ol> | <ol> | ||
| − | |||
{{DistributedPlanningGame|Ray King}} | {{DistributedPlanningGame|Ray King}} | ||
{{DistributedPlanningGame|Asma Khan}} | {{DistributedPlanningGame|Asma Khan}} | ||
| Line 25: | Line 24: | ||
{{DistributedPlanningGame|John Stanton}} | {{DistributedPlanningGame|John Stanton}} | ||
{{DistributedPlanningGame|Asad Butt}} | {{DistributedPlanningGame|Asad Butt}} | ||
| + | {{DistributedPlanningGame|Obed Suhail}} | ||
</ol> | </ol> | ||
Revision as of 13:34, 27 August 2007
[[ConsensusPoll:Distributed Planning Game|
To participate, enter your name as would like it to appear (after the slash).
|
|
Status: NotYet
- We have 57% (4) YES of 7 Staff
NotYet ---------- NotYet
Staff
YES ---------- YES
- TedErnst (AboutUsStaff)
- NotYet I think the template for a new task needs to be much simpler, perhaps the way Dev is doing it? Also, I'm concerned that many staff have not seen this page and don't know that they can help improve this process.
edit
Discussion - NotYet I think the template for a new task needs to be much simpler, perhaps the way Dev is doing it? Also, I'm concerned that many staff have not seen this page and don't know that they can help improve this process.
- John Stanton (AboutUsStaff)
- YES I think we have a workable structure now and this consensus poll can only make it better.. edit
Discussion - YES I think we have a workable structure now and this consensus poll can only make it better..
- Asad Butt (AboutUsStaff)
- YES I think the model is a good one to start with. Of course we will refine it as we use it more and more. edit
Discussion - YES I think the model is a good one to start with. Of course we will refine it as we use it more and more.
Staff
