Difference between revisions of "User talk:Martin"

(~)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
==[[RiskParticipation]]==  
 
==[[RiskParticipation]]==  
 
==[[BetterAutomation]]==
 
==[[BetterAutomation]]==
 +
 +
== ~ ==
 +
 +
Martin, love your energy on this.  Our current focus is on getting lots of examples of small consensus polls that succeed.  Personally, I think that's what's needed to get to your step#1, of a foundation agreeign to try this crazy thig.  We need a track record.  Something we could use help on right now is the consensus poll tour.  Interested in taking a look and either editing directly or providing feedback? [[Portal:ConsensusPolls]] Thanks! [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]]

Revision as of 18:16, 13 July 2007

Inventing that Helps Tiny Businesses


In general I am a student of “process”. I try to observe and understand what really makes things tick. This has relevance to transparency, democracy, and empowerment issues. Sometimes the most important things for the populace to know, are things that some relatively “few” people within the populace don’t want others to know. When students of process are observing and trying to understand your process, they risk being viewed as a pain in the neck – it’s not an activity where one should expect to get lots of “high fives”.

Some subjects that catch my interest are listed below:

Topsoil

Process Transparency

RiskParticipation

BetterAutomation

~

Martin, love your energy on this. Our current focus is on getting lots of examples of small consensus polls that succeed. Personally, I think that's what's needed to get to your step#1, of a foundation agreeign to try this crazy thig. We need a track record. Something we could use help on right now is the consensus poll tour. Interested in taking a look and either editing directly or providing feedback? Portal:ConsensusPolls Thanks! TedErnst