Difference between revisions of "RefactorReviews:LearningTheProcess"
Obed Suhail (talk | contribs) (creating new task review refactoring) |
Obed Suhail (talk | contribs) (→Steps we expect to take to get to DoneDone) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* Adding to the list below for paring later whenever we come across a review that needs to be refactored. | * Adding to the list below for paring later whenever we come across a review that needs to be refactored. | ||
| + | * Refactoring valuable reviews | ||
* Coming up with a strategy for the process. | * Coming up with a strategy for the process. | ||
| − | |||
===If you are unsure of how to do this, check out these=== | ===If you are unsure of how to do this, check out these=== | ||
Revision as of 07:01, 15 November 2007
What
- Refactoring reviews to make them constructive and valuable, and learning the process of doing it
Why
- To facilitate communication between organizations and their constituents. We are thinking about helping people make their reviews constructive. If reviews have no potential of being constructive we don't think they should be apart of this place.
DoneDone
- When we have come up with a way to do it efficiently
Steps we expect to take to get to DoneDone
- Adding to the list below for paring later whenever we come across a review that needs to be refactored.
- Refactoring valuable reviews
- Coming up with a strategy for the process.
If you are unsure of how to do this, check out these
Add the ones you are interested in working on
Big list to chose from:
Discussion/Links/etc
