Difference between revisions of "LaptopPolicy:Status/TakKendrick"

(removing comments that don't seem to apply anymore - please revert if I'm wrong)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
<div class="NavHead" style="padding-left:1em; background:#F5E10F;">Discussion</div>
 
<div class="NavHead" style="padding-left:1em; background:#F5E10F;">Discussion</div>
 
<div class="NavContent">
 
<div class="NavContent">
I added "after three months" language in an attempt to address your concern... See #1. After that period you've earned it in my opinion. Also, we claim to assume good faith, so the laptop purchase for employees seems like doing that. While not doing it because we think you might quit is not. - [[ScottKeeler|Scott Keeler]] <span class="plainlinks">[{{SERVER}}{{localurl:ScottKeeler}} http://images.aboutus.org/images/1/1a/Comment_green.gif]</span>
 
  
: Tak, are you concerned about people taking advantage of this policy to get a laptop and splitting. Or are you concerned AboutUs would be taking advantage so people wont be able to leave once they get the laptop?
 
:: Yes, I'm concerned about both.
 
 
:: Tak, did you see the recent changes made to [[LaptopPolicy]]? How do you feel about it now? Looking forward to hearing from you soon!
 
 
::: My thoughts on a few of your concerns:  First on folks taking advantage of the policy by "taking the laptop and running", there is a $750 risk (for the company contributed portion), which I think is not very high compared with the other costs of someone leaving.  The other $750 (if someone is on a payment plan) may be at risk also, but thats not different than the risk of someone simply walking out with a company laptop.  On the "indentured servitude", I think that by making it clear that the company contribution is given without strings, that should eliminate that concern.  On taking advantage of the policy every six months, I think a new laptop purchase should make sense and be agreed to by all.  i.e. If a person drops their laptop just after the warranty expires, then they need a new one, but if they just bought one 3 weeks ago, they probably don't need a new one.  - [[User:Ray King|Ray]] | <small>[[User talk:Ray King|talk]]</small>
 
  
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 18:56, 28 August 2007

NotYet Let me start out by saying I think this policy is great. I do agree with Scott's thought though. I think this is part of a larger "Employee Benefits" conversation that we need to have. The fact that the Portland staff doesn't have health insurance is a much larger drain on my monthly resources than a one-off cost of a new laptop. I'm not saying that I don't support the laptop initiative (because I definitely think it's a great idea) but just that I think we need to start having the larger conversation before devoting resources to individual one-time needs rather than looking at something that effects a larger group of employees on a monthly basis. In a perfect world, we'd have the resources for both initiatives and I'm even willing to say, "Yes" on this one if there's an plan to implement a broader benefits package as soon as the resources are available (like after the funding round). Edit-chalk-10bo12.png edit




Retrieved from "http://aboutus.com/index.php?title=LaptopPolicy:Status/TakKendrick&oldid=9259646"