Difference between revisions of "LaptopPolicy:Status/TakKendrick"
TakKendrick (talk | contribs) |
TakKendrick (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
: Tak, are you concerned about people taking advantage of this policy to get a laptop and splitting. Or are you concerned AboutUs would be taking advantage so people wont be able to leave once they get the laptop? | : Tak, are you concerned about people taking advantage of this policy to get a laptop and splitting. Or are you concerned AboutUs would be taking advantage so people wont be able to leave once they get the laptop? | ||
+ | :: Yes, I'm concerned about both. | ||
:: Tak, did you see the recent changes made to [[LaptopPolicy]]? How do you feel about it now? Looking forward to hearing from you soon! | :: Tak, did you see the recent changes made to [[LaptopPolicy]]? How do you feel about it now? Looking forward to hearing from you soon! | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 18:20, 14 August 2007
NotYet I agree with Ward's comments below. The policy is ok if it vests over a couple of years. Beyond that, I also think that while this could be a useful policy, that AboutUs resources would be better suited to first provide other employee benefits, especially health insurance and a better living wage. edit
Discussion
I added "after three months" language in an attempt to address your concern... See #1. After that period you've earned it in my opinion. Also, we claim to assume good faith, so the laptop purchase for employees seems like doing that. While not doing it because we think you might quit is not. - Scott Keeler
- Tak, are you concerned about people taking advantage of this policy to get a laptop and splitting. Or are you concerned AboutUs would be taking advantage so people wont be able to leave once they get the laptop?
- Yes, I'm concerned about both.
- Tak, did you see the recent changes made to LaptopPolicy? How do you feel about it now? Looking forward to hearing from you soon!