Difference between revisions of "WikiProcess"

(Here I go again ...)
 
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
When I type words on a page I read them back and I react to what I read, and my reaction leads to my writing more words. This is what authors do for readers - they control the reader's reactions by providing their own continuations. But here I'm not writing for readers ... I'm not targeting my words at an audience ... I don't provide the continuation of these words. I'm jotting down thoughts that will be developed by everyone who reads them. Everyone is "I" for these words. You, me, everybody, everybody who clicks "edit".
 
When I type words on a page I read them back and I react to what I read, and my reaction leads to my writing more words. This is what authors do for readers - they control the reader's reactions by providing their own continuations. But here I'm not writing for readers ... I'm not targeting my words at an audience ... I don't provide the continuation of these words. I'm jotting down thoughts that will be developed by everyone who reads them. Everyone is "I" for these words. You, me, everybody, everybody who clicks "edit".
  
Some newbies don't get this - they reply rather than edit and [[ThreadMess]] occurs. ThreadMess is community as it is generally known on blogs and groups, but that's really not the [http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?WikiNature WikiNature]. The WikiNature is when I accept that I am writing these words - not "I" the original author of these words but "I" the reader, the "I, yes I, me". I type with my fingers, and my fingers are different fingers every time I click the [[Save page]] button. All these "I"s are I, the fused identity of the page as it comes into existence.
+
Some newbies don't grok this - they reply rather than edit and [[ThreadMess]] occurs. ThreadMess is community as it is generally known on blogs and groups, but that's really not the [http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?WikiNature WikiNature]. The WikiNature is when I accept that I am writing these words - not "I" the original author of these words but "I" the reader, the "I, yes I, me". I type with my fingers, and my fingers are different fingers every time I click the [[Save page]] button. All these "I"s are I, the fused identity of the page as it comes into existence.
  
 
So wiki is not about community. It is about the [[WikiProcess]] of fusing all our identities into my [http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?DramaticIdentity identity].
 
So wiki is not about community. It is about the [[WikiProcess]] of fusing all our identities into my [http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?DramaticIdentity identity].

Revision as of 11:40, 30 May 2007

Some say wiki is about community. But this misses the initial and central epiphany of wiki: the fusion of community into identity.

When I type words on a page I read them back and I react to what I read, and my reaction leads to my writing more words. This is what authors do for readers - they control the reader's reactions by providing their own continuations. But here I'm not writing for readers ... I'm not targeting my words at an audience ... I don't provide the continuation of these words. I'm jotting down thoughts that will be developed by everyone who reads them. Everyone is "I" for these words. You, me, everybody, everybody who clicks "edit".

Some newbies don't grok this - they reply rather than edit and ThreadMess occurs. ThreadMess is community as it is generally known on blogs and groups, but that's really not the WikiNature. The WikiNature is when I accept that I am writing these words - not "I" the original author of these words but "I" the reader, the "I, yes I, me". I type with my fingers, and my fingers are different fingers every time I click the Save page button. All these "I"s are I, the fused identity of the page as it comes into existence.

So wiki is not about community. It is about the WikiProcess of fusing all our identities into my identity.



Retrieved from "http://aboutus.com/index.php?title=WikiProcess&oldid=7084943"