Difference between revisions of "ExiledMothers.co.uk"

(→‎Related Domains: whoops)
Line 67: Line 67:
 
He said: “I asked more than three times a week. I gave them the address of a Muslim family, and a Muslim adoption agency. She asked them to take her to the mosque just to eat the food. She loved it. Mohammad AlFayed gives it for Ramadan. But they wouldn’t take her.”  
 
He said: “I asked more than three times a week. I gave them the address of a Muslim family, and a Muslim adoption agency. She asked them to take her to the mosque just to eat the food. She loved it. Mohammad AlFayed gives it for Ramadan. But they wouldn’t take her.”  
 
Her mother Mary added: “I’d have liked her to be in a mixed family. It might have helped her to keep going to the mosque. She was with an ordinary English family.”
 
Her mother Mary added: “I’d have liked her to be in a mixed family. It might have helped her to keep going to the mosque. She was with an ordinary English family.”
−
A Town Hall spokeswoman said: “We were all extremely saddened by Salma’s death and we continue to support her family during this very difficult time.  
+
...............................................................................
−
 
 
−
“Camden Council has some of the best social workers in the country and a strong record of effectively protecting and supporting children, young people and families. To suggest otherwise is a huge disservice to children and young people in Camden because people need to come to us when they are worried about children.  
 
−
“Children in care, or who are subject to care proceedings, have a right to privacy and we have both a responsibility and legal requirement to protect it. We take this very seriously and are concerned that details of children’s, often difficult, lives are being played out on the pages of a newspaper.  
 
−
 
 
−
“Sensationalising one side of complicated cases puts children at risk. Among the reasons children are taken into care are neglect, domestic violence, physical and sexual abuse, and drug and alcohol abuse.  
 
−
“It’s fundamentally important that children and parents are not deterred from seeking help and that our looked-after children have confidence in the care they are receiving. Keeping families together when it’s in the best interest of the child is always our priority and our legal duty.
 
−
 
 
−
“The facts speak for themselves – last year there were more referrals to Camden’s children social services and fewer children in our care. This means our work to keep families together is succeeding.
 
−
“We would all be failing children if worries kept just one person quiet when the welfare of a child is at stake
 
−
[http://www.example.com link title]
 
  
  
 
==An urgent need to abolish secrecy in the family courts==
 
==An urgent need to abolish secrecy in the family courts==
  
−
It is impossible to defend a system from accusations of bias and discrimination if it operates in secret. Family courts must be open, argues Trevor Jones
+
It is impossible to defend a system from accusations of bias and discrimination if it operates in secret. Family courts must be open, argues Trevor Jones PAIN
−
 
 
−
THE tragic death of Salma ElSharkawy while in the care of Camden Council has placed the spotlight very much on the workings of social services and in particular the decisions made in secret in the family courts.
 
−
As a seasoned campaigner wanting to open up the secret family court system to scrutiny you might expect me to say that “it is quite indefensible that there should be no access by the media and no access by the public to what is going on in courts where judges are day-by-day taking people’s children away”.
 
−
However, these are not my words but the words of the Hon Mr Justice Munby, an experienced family court judge, giving evidence to Parliament last year.
 
−
 
 
−
His informed opinion was echoed at the time by Harriet Harman, the then family justice minister, who said that the status quo – in terms of the closed nature of the family courts – is not an option when in July 2006 she launched a full consultation, Confidence and Confidentiality: Open­ness in the family courts, admitting that “it is impossible to defend a system from accusations of bias and discrimination if it operates behind doors”.
 
−
A year later the government felt no need to open up the family court system and actually laid out plans to make the family courts less transparent by extending the secrecy to family proceedings in magistrates’ courts which are currently open to the press in most cases.
 
−
 
 
−
This blatant U-turn was justified by the then Lord Chancellor, Lord Falconer, who had listened to the views of 200 children and young people and had concluded that they had “overwhelmingly rejected the idea” of opening up the courts. However, the Consultation Response Paper, published in March of this year, revealed that most of the children agreed that it should be up to the people involved in the case – there certainly was not a clear agreement on banning the press from all or part of the proceedings.
 
−
 
 
−
What is abundantly clear, though, is that the pressure to keep the family courts closed came not from the children but from organisations who say they represent the children.
 
−
An important part of the consultation was to identify relevant interes­ted parties and those whom the policy will be likely to affect. These groups, termed stakeholder groups, were contacted and engaged in discussion in the policy development process.
 
  
−
The 41 stakeholders included social services, judges, magistrates, ­
+
..............................................................................
−
law­yers, healthcare professionals and many organisations representing children. Not one stakeholder was a parent group representing the thousands of parents who are in danger each year of having their children removed permanently from their care.
 
  
−
Twenty years ago there was only Parents Against Injustice actively supporting falsely accused parents who were in the process of having their children wrongly removed by the family courts and over that time it has dealt with 13,000 cases. Today, there are more than two dozen such organisations helping families each year cope with the prospect of losing their children forever via a secret court system.
+
10th August 2007
  
−
To suggest that there is nothing wrong with this system completely ig­nores the common themes that have become apparent in cases over recent years and their sheer volume points to a potential injustice on a colossal scale.
+
−
Many parents complain of the bullying tactics and intimidation that social services use to stop them speaking out through fear of it being used against them in court.
 
  
−
In a recent survey of 1,200 records of families who have contacted Families anti-Social Services Inquiry Team (FASSIT) an organisation offering support and advice to parents, nearly all parents claimed that social workers and other court officials were committing perjury in the family court to secure the taking of their children into care or to be adopted.
+
  
−
The system allows for social workers to be able to work on an almost totally subjective rather than objective basis and to manipulate evidence to suit their needs. Meetings with social workers are invariably prevented from being recorded and it is common practice once the local authority has set its objective that it only submits information to the court that is negative and deliberately withholds the redeeming features about the parent from the proceedings.
+
  
−
Independent assessments ordered by the court into a parent’s ­ability to look after a child can be undertaken by family centres directly funded by the local authorities who are therefore under pressure to perform to ensure their contracts are renewed.
+
Dear Lords, Baronesses and MP’s,
  
−
However, the most worrying trend is the use of the catch-all phrase that the child might be in danger of harm in the future even in cases where there is no evidence of any abuse in the past.
+
−
Innocent parents cannot possibly defend themselves against someone’s opinion that some time in the future they might harm their children.
 
  
−
There are just too many contested cases to suggest that the system is operating fairly and while the government justifies the secret nature of the family courts by saying it is to protect children, it also protects other bodies, such as social services, and that is very worrying.
+
−
• Trevor Jones runs the London branch of Parents Against Injustice, Archway.
 
  
−
[[parentsagainstinjustice.org.uk]]
+
Re: Urgent Government Action Immediate intervention needed
  
−
Britain's maternity crisis: A crying shame
+
−
Too few trained staff, a massive shortage of midwives, and poor resources mean that hundreds of babies are dying needlessly each year and that death rates in childbirth are showing no signs of declining, despite medical advances. Jonathan Owen reports
 
  
−
Related Articles
+
−
Midwives accuse ministers of hypocrisy over training
 
  
−
[[Independent.co.uk]] 23 September 2007
+
Children are committing suicide, children are being raped and children are being ripped away from their parents.  
  
 +
  
−
Up to 1,000 babies that are born dead each year could be saved if doctors and midwives were better trained to spot vital warning signs, according to one of the UK's leading experts on stillbirths. Health experts say the numbers of stillbirths in the UK are alarmingly high – 10 times the level of cot deaths – and most are unexplained.  
+
This happens every day in England. The Children’s Act is being used as a weapon by Social Workers to break up families and nothing is being done to stop this. Why?
  
 +
  
 +
In Camden alone, the Chief Executive Moira Gibb, a Social Worker herself who was called in to give her opinion on the tragic Victoria Climbie case, gives her Social Workers the licence to make up stories and lies to get children taken away. You have to stop this.
  
−
Almost 4,000 babies were stillborn in Britain last year according to the latest government figures. Despite falling since the 1960s, the rate of stillbirths has remained stubbornly unchanged for more than a decade and the rate (per 1,000 births) actually went up from 5.3 in 2001 to 5.7 in 2003. Figures show significant regional variations across the UK with London (6.3) and the East Midlands (5.7) showing the highest rates in England.
+
  
−
Research by the Perinatal Institute indicates that women living in the most deprived areas are twice as likely to have a stillbirth as those living in the least deprived areas, with babies of poorer women twice as likely to die before they are a month old. Black and Asian women are at increased risk of having a stillbirth compared with their white counterparts.
+
Emmanuel Freeman told all and sundry that my children were being sexually abused. This was never the case. The complaint was never fully investigated.  He was never disciplined and never held accountable. This is perjury and malfeasance.  Carole Marshall, Karen Grenstad and Joanne Smith lied about the welfare of my children.  My children are very intelligent, healthy and happy. They made up stories stating that my son wets his bed. This has never been the case. The list goes on.  
  
−
Stillbirth rates in Britain have fallen dramatically since 1960, when 30 out of every 1,000 newborn babies were stillborn or died soon after delivery. During recent years maternity care has been transformed beyond all recognition, with continuing advances in knowledge and technology, even prompting concerns in some quarters about the medicalisation of childbirth. But stillbirths have not gone down as one might have expected, staying at about the same level for more than a decade. Britain lags behind many European countries and is near the bottom of the table for Western European countries, with Italy, Sweden and Switzerland having rates of just 3 per cent. Only Andorra, Ireland, Portugal and Luxembourg have a higher stillbirth rate than Britain.
+
  
−
"Our research has shown the largest percentage of stillbirths were associated with the baby not having grown well in the womb. It found that the majority of these stillbirths were potentially avoidable," said Professor Cardosi. "This reflects previous confidential inquiries that have been done nationally. Increasingly, we are starting to identify that there is also an issue about resources, in terms of midwifery caseload and in terms of providing ultrasound to check for foetal growth for high-risk pregnancies."
+
Salma was taken away for no apparent reason and now she is dead. Other children have been raped in Camden. These are not isolated incidents.  Moira Gibb will not allow the Camden New Journal to report the truth but threatens it with legal action if it does. Why? Not one Social Worker, Moira Gibb or Heather Schroeder has ever been disciplined or struck off. Why? These are children’s lives with which Section 47 of the Children’s Act can and will be used against children and parents.  Yet not one Social Worker has ever been made accountable for their perjury, malfeasance or their unsubstantiated accusations.  
  
−
"Between 10 and 20 per cent of all pregnancies are affected by foetal growth restriction and are therefore have a five- or tenfold increased risk of stillbirth, but we only recognise around a third of these at the moment," said Professor Gardosi, adding that the importance of foetal growth restriction has been underestimated. "Distinction has always been muddled because we've been using the same charts for all pregnancies. We have developed customised growth charts that will give us a more accurate idea of growth rate and help us identify those babies that are smaller than they should be."
+
−
Campaigners are now calling for urgent action to drive down stillbirths. Despite the fact that 10 babies are stillborn every day in Britain and a further seven die within the first four weeks of life, there is no national strategy for reducing these deaths. Neale Long, director of Sands, said: "We have long felt that stillbirth rates in the UK are just too high. The charity is calling for changes in practice that could help reduce the loss of life.
 
  
−
"There is growing concern that overstretched maternity resources are resulting in a reduction in quality of care and leading to unnecessary deaths. We are determined to raise awareness of the human impact of stillbirth and ensure that the task of reducing stillbirths is given the national priority it deserves."
+
To be charged with murder you must provide evidence to prove beyond reasonable that the crime has been committed and yet Social Workers never have to provide tangible evidence to support their accusations.
  
−
Professor Andrew Shennan from the baby charity Tommy's said stillbirths are more common than many realise. "For us it's a weekly problem in our hospital," he said. "We see it all the time and it's devastating, particularly when it's unexpected." He acknowledged that the ways in which pregnant women are monitored need to improve.
+
  
−
Research into stillbirths has been a neglected area, according to Professor Shennan. "I think we need research to look very carefully at the reasons why these babies are dying as a first step to solving the problem," he said. "This area is very neglected and dead babies have traditionally not been a high priority.
+
The 3-stage complaints process is never carried out within the time limits and guidelines. No one is ever kept up to date with the complaints and questions are never answered. The LGO will not investigate the matter and refuses Independent Reviews. No one wants to listen therefore you have a public duty to do so.  Solicitors get rich from the Legal Aid system, children die or are raped, social workers keep their jobs, children die or are raped, judges listen to lies, children die or get raped.
  
−
"Babies still die unexpectedly, even during labour, at a rate that I think would shock people. The shocking thing really is that they are so often unexplained and my own feeling is that with a little bit of resource we could probably answer a lot of questions."
+
The Human Rights Act, The Protection from Harassment Act and the UN Charter for children are purposely disregarded. Children die or are raped. There is no protection for the children or the parents. They continue to flout the law....
  
−
Recent months have seen rising concern within the medical profession about the persistent levels of unexplained stillbirths. The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH) warned that "the lack of progress in reducing the stillbirth rate is a matter of considerable public health concern".
+
...Fostering is a profitable business.  Camden Council as well as other boroughs actively encourages this facility.  Children die or get raped.  Foster parents get rich.
 +
........It is well known that social workers’ involvement with children results in high rates of children committing suicide, self-harming, drug addiction, alcohol abuse, become sexual abusers themselves.  
  
−
And Sir Liam Donaldson, the chief medical officer, has declared the current level of stillbirths involving apparently healthy babies as " unacceptable", adding that "many could have been avoidable". In a report released earlier this year, he called on the Government to research and review infant deaths. The concerns are echoed by the Royal College of Gynaecologists, which also said a lack of information on causes of death is impeding attempts to reduce stillbirths.
+
....FASSIT, PAIN and other organisations have been campaigning against this practice for years and yet is shameful that the Government has sat on its laurels, has allowed this to happen and continues to do so. Why?
  
−
But research has been hampered by the Alder Hey body-parts scandal of the 1990s, with the majority of parents now declining post-mortems.
+
......The Family Courts need to be made open.  Children are silenced.  Despite the UN Charter stating that their voices must be heard............
  
−
A Department of Health spokesperson said: "Research has not yet pinpointed a specific cause for this phenomenon, which is why it is essential that vital work into this area continues. Current government research funding specifically into premature births stands at around £3.7m per year."
+
  
−
Sue MacDonald, spokeswomen for Royal College of Midwives, agreed that the current level of stillbirths is a cause for concern. "We want to carry on reducing the rate of stillbirths and neonatal deaths. For a family, the loss of a baby is a tragedy and we need to reduce that as soon as possible. Stillbirths are very traumatic; being there for the birth is painful for everyone concerned. Not all are preventable, but we want to make sure that the ones that can be prevented are."
+
Help the children. Help the parents. Stop the abuse.............ENGLAND
  
−
Stillbirths can no longer be ignored, according to Mr Long, director of Sands. "There has been a taboo around stillbirths for far too long but these deaths should no longer be swept under the carpet. This does nothing to help the thousands of people whose lives are changed for ever when their babies are born dead each year."
+
  
−
Campaigners are now calling on the Government to develop a national strategy for stillbirth prevention and address the chronic shortages that remain in maternity care.
 
  
−
Bereaved parents: 'When Thomas was born, it was the worst kind of silence you can imagine'
 
  
−
For Samantha Springall, 27, who lives with her partner Wayne, 40, in Crawley, Sussex, the news that she was pregnant after two miscarriages filled her with hope. "After I got past 12 weeks it didn't even occur to me that something could go wrong."
+
  
−
But after a "low-risk" pregnancy with normal scan results, Ms Springall discovered that her son Thomas had died in the womb. He was stillborn on 15 August 2006. "When Thomas was born, it was the worst kind of silence you can imagine," she said. "You expect your baby is going to cry, but when you give birth to someone that's dead and see them being taken away you just think this isn't the way it's supposed to be."
+
I trust that you will help the children, their parents and for all those who have died. Show them that you are a government that actually cares.  
  
−
Doctors had failed to spot signs of foetal growth restriction, one of the main factors in full-term stillbirth. "At the time you're not really sure what it means but I began to realise and then the anger kicked in. The inconsistency of antenatal care was definitely a factor.
+
Creature S.
 +
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 +
E-mail <email>f219dfa8c4f4dfc155867077421de610</email>
 +
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
−
"With a stillbirth you're mourning for what could have been. All the time, all the milestones, like his birthday, we mark them."
 
  
−
Jonathan Owen
 
  
−
This is how the British Goverment betrays the most vulnerable of its citizen....The children!
+
==
 +
== This is how the British Goverment betrays the most vulnerable of its citizen....The children! == ==
 
Not without my daughter England, Uk !!!The "Suffocating Secrecy" in ENGLANDShe threw herself "Out of the Window"When the Grass is cut, then the Snakes Will show!!Not without my daughter Not without my daughter UKVScampaign & mission statementLatest NewsMyself, my story, my tragedyPhotosRelated linksEl Cartel surrounding the English Family CourtsMy crime? Stockholm Syndrome !!!contact informationRecent Quoteswhat to do and whenDead children and survivals get segregatedNewspapersHungerStrike's DiaryWho is Camden SS ?Cuando se corta la grama, aparecen Las Serpientes!Jamais Sans Ma Fille, Angleterre !!!Other Stories...how you can helpAunque Ud. no lo crea!Thanks, Merci, Danke Muchas gracias!Judges from HellIn Russian PYCCKAR BEPCNRHunger Strike for Justice !Huelga de Hambre hasta cantar...Victoria !Nicht Ohne Meine Tochter UK !!A smiling girl..she wasDesobediencia Civil DisobedienceThe English Holocaust 1902 and on in 2008!Why Divorcing in England is a "longlife Tragedy"Epilogue, EpilogoComing to England with children.Stop and read thisSupport
 
Not without my daughter England, Uk !!!The "Suffocating Secrecy" in ENGLANDShe threw herself "Out of the Window"When the Grass is cut, then the Snakes Will show!!Not without my daughter Not without my daughter UKVScampaign & mission statementLatest NewsMyself, my story, my tragedyPhotosRelated linksEl Cartel surrounding the English Family CourtsMy crime? Stockholm Syndrome !!!contact informationRecent Quoteswhat to do and whenDead children and survivals get segregatedNewspapersHungerStrike's DiaryWho is Camden SS ?Cuando se corta la grama, aparecen Las Serpientes!Jamais Sans Ma Fille, Angleterre !!!Other Stories...how you can helpAunque Ud. no lo crea!Thanks, Merci, Danke Muchas gracias!Judges from HellIn Russian PYCCKAR BEPCNRHunger Strike for Justice !Huelga de Hambre hasta cantar...Victoria !Nicht Ohne Meine Tochter UK !!A smiling girl..she wasDesobediencia Civil DisobedienceThe English Holocaust 1902 and on in 2008!Why Divorcing in England is a "longlife Tragedy"Epilogue, EpilogoComing to England with children.Stop and read thisSupport
  

Revision as of 18:59, 31 January 2008

Rating: 0 - 0 votes

Company Name

Company Contact

Website Analysis

Domain Whois

Powered by who.is

Page Type

This page is about a company.

Not without my daughter UK

Created with tears, written in pain, published with faith in justice.

ExiledMothers.co.uk is a website spotlighting the secrecy within the UK family legal system and British government and the cost it has on the children and mothers of Great Britain.

Exiled Mothers' purpose is to form a coalition of small groups within the UK as well as international alliance to pressure the British government to update its legal system and erode the discrimination that takes place behind closed doors.

In England, cruelty towards children is systematically perform daily. The reason hundreds children end up in the "care" system is not because of any physical ill treatment, or neglect as claimed by Camden Council. Most have been taken because well paid "experts" say the children are "at risk" of emotional abuse or "at risk" of exposure to domestic violence !

Parents are in effect found guilty not of crimes they have committed but of crimes these soothsayers styled as "experts" think they might commit in the future!

No jury would take children for adoption under such flimsy pretexts so the sooner the establishment family judges are sacked and replaced by juries when questions of adoption or long term fostering arise, the sooner most of these flagrant injustices will be eliminated. A burglar facing a possible 6 months or more in prison can demand a jury and so should parents facing in effect a life sentence when losing children in secret courts to forced adoption!

I have lost my daughter, but there are many children to save!

Camden New Journal - EXCLUSIVE by ROISIN GADELRAB Published: 2 August 2007


Salma ElSharkaway MILLIONS TO BE MADE FROM FOSTER CARE

Probe reveals firms charge £3,000 a week per child

AN investigation into the tragic death of 12-year-old Salma ElSharkawy while in the care of Camden’s social services has revealed how the fostering of children has been turned into a multi-million pound business. Haverstock School pupil Salma, who was killed in a car crash last month, had been placed at a private children’s home in the Peak District, Derbyshire, where care costs £150,000 a year, the New Journal can reveal. Salma’s four-month stay at the Adventure Care centre cost Camden taxpayers £46,000 – £2,900 a week. Accounts for Adventure Care, which has two company directors – social worker Helen Slater and outdoor ‘educator’ Garry Codman – are not publicly audited under an exemption scheme for small businesses.

Inquiries show that Camden Council has 319 children in care, at a cost of £8 million a year. In the last financial year, Camden spent £3.4 million on 53 children in residential homes – £64,000 a child annually. Private ­foster care for 82 children cost £2.6 million – £31,700 a child annually. Another £2 million was spent on providing council foster care for 158 children – £12,600 per child a year.

During her two years in care, Salma was n from page 1placed with three foster carers. John Hemming, Lib Dem MP for Birmingham Yardley, who is chairman of family law reform group Justice for Families, said: “There’s a lot of centres out there that are that expensive. “A lot of money is made out of children in care. Salma’s case shows how the system did nothing at all positive at any stage and how a lot of people made a lot of money out of her.

“I don’t think this girl should have been in care. She kept running away to be at home.” Salma was not the only Camden child to have been placed at Adventure Care, where the children are schooled and have the chance to go horse-riding. Camden has placed one other child at the centre, although it is unclear for how long. Further investigations reveal 76 per cent of Camden’s children in care were placed outside the borough, higher than the national average of 55 per cent. This adds to the expense to the council, which, on top of the cost of fostering or residential care, has to pay for social workers to supervise contact visits and parents’ expenses. Salma’s story has provoked letters, emails and visits from parents whose children have been taken away by Camden’s social services.

Her parents, Walid ElSharkawy and Mary O’Sullivan, have spent the last week protesting outside Parliament. Mr ElSharkawy now plans to take his campaign to the Town Hall steps.

He has placed Salma’s story on the video-sharing website YouTube, where a voiceover talks of his despair at not getting the help he wanted from Labour MP Frank Dobson, over a display of photos of his protest and Salma’s grandmother sitting by her grave.

Mr Dobson, MP for Holborn and St Pancras, said: “If someone gets in touch with me about a child in care I always take it up with the council. Mr ElSharkawy says I told him it was before the courts. I can’t interfere with court judgments.

“I’m very sorry for what happened to their daughter. I can understand their anguish.” Mr ElSharkawy has spoken of his distress at the way he learned of his daughter’s death. He received a phone call at 6pm from someone who wanted her dental records but would not say why – he does not know who called. Five hours later the police visited to tell him his daughter had been killed. He said: “When the police came and said “we’ve got the worst news ever”, I knew she was dead.” Leaked documents also reveal how the police’s Missing Persons Unit was uncomfortable about taking Salma from her parents each time she ran away.

A meeting to discuss her care described her parents as “loving” and told how Salma threatened to kill herself on several occasions, once being grabbed by police as she threatened to throw herself from a balcony at a friend’s house.

Just before she was taken to Adventure Care, she ran away, managing to live on the streets for three weeks. Mr ElSharkawy has complained about the fact that Salma, who had a mixed Irish Egyptian background, was never placed with a foster carer who took into consideration her Muslim roots, despite Department of Health guidelines stating “racial, ethnic, religious, cultural and linguistic needs” should be considered.

He said: “I asked more than three times a week. I gave them the address of a Muslim family, and a Muslim adoption agency. She asked them to take her to the mosque just to eat the food. She loved it. Mohammad AlFayed gives it for Ramadan. But they wouldn’t take her.” Her mother Mary added: “I’d have liked her to be in a mixed family. It might have helped her to keep going to the mosque. She was with an ordinary English family.” ...............................................................................


An urgent need to abolish secrecy in the family courts

It is impossible to defend a system from accusations of bias and discrimination if it operates in secret. Family courts must be open, argues Trevor Jones PAIN

..............................................................................

10th August 2007




Dear Lords, Baronesses and MP’s,



Re: Urgent Government Action Immediate intervention needed



Children are committing suicide, children are being raped and children are being ripped away from their parents.


This happens every day in England. The Children’s Act is being used as a weapon by Social Workers to break up families and nothing is being done to stop this. Why?


In Camden alone, the Chief Executive Moira Gibb, a Social Worker herself who was called in to give her opinion on the tragic Victoria Climbie case, gives her Social Workers the licence to make up stories and lies to get children taken away. You have to stop this.


Emmanuel Freeman told all and sundry that my children were being sexually abused. This was never the case. The complaint was never fully investigated. He was never disciplined and never held accountable. This is perjury and malfeasance. Carole Marshall, Karen Grenstad and Joanne Smith lied about the welfare of my children. My children are very intelligent, healthy and happy. They made up stories stating that my son wets his bed. This has never been the case. The list goes on.


Salma was taken away for no apparent reason and now she is dead. Other children have been raped in Camden. These are not isolated incidents. Moira Gibb will not allow the Camden New Journal to report the truth but threatens it with legal action if it does. Why? Not one Social Worker, Moira Gibb or Heather Schroeder has ever been disciplined or struck off. Why? These are children’s lives with which Section 47 of the Children’s Act can and will be used against children and parents. Yet not one Social Worker has ever been made accountable for their perjury, malfeasance or their unsubstantiated accusations.


To be charged with murder you must provide evidence to prove beyond reasonable that the crime has been committed and yet Social Workers never have to provide tangible evidence to support their accusations.


The 3-stage complaints process is never carried out within the time limits and guidelines. No one is ever kept up to date with the complaints and questions are never answered. The LGO will not investigate the matter and refuses Independent Reviews. No one wants to listen therefore you have a public duty to do so. Solicitors get rich from the Legal Aid system, children die or are raped, social workers keep their jobs, children die or are raped, judges listen to lies, children die or get raped.

The Human Rights Act, The Protection from Harassment Act and the UN Charter for children are purposely disregarded. Children die or are raped. There is no protection for the children or the parents. They continue to flout the law....

...Fostering is a profitable business. Camden Council as well as other boroughs actively encourages this facility. Children die or get raped. Foster parents get rich. ........It is well known that social workers’ involvement with children results in high rates of children committing suicide, self-harming, drug addiction, alcohol abuse, become sexual abusers themselves.

....FASSIT, PAIN and other organisations have been campaigning against this practice for years and yet is shameful that the Government has sat on its laurels, has allowed this to happen and continues to do so. Why?

......The Family Courts need to be made open. Children are silenced. Despite the UN Charter stating that their voices must be heard............


Help the children. Help the parents. Stop the abuse.............ENGLAND




I trust that you will help the children, their parents and for all those who have died. Show them that you are a government that actually cares.

Creature S.

E-mail


==

This is how the British Goverment betrays the most vulnerable of its citizen....The children! ==

Not without my daughter England, Uk !!!The "Suffocating Secrecy" in ENGLANDShe threw herself "Out of the Window"When the Grass is cut, then the Snakes Will show!!Not without my daughter Not without my daughter UKVScampaign & mission statementLatest NewsMyself, my story, my tragedyPhotosRelated linksEl Cartel surrounding the English Family CourtsMy crime? Stockholm Syndrome !!!contact informationRecent Quoteswhat to do and whenDead children and survivals get segregatedNewspapersHungerStrike's DiaryWho is Camden SS ?Cuando se corta la grama, aparecen Las Serpientes!Jamais Sans Ma Fille, Angleterre !!!Other Stories...how you can helpAunque Ud. no lo crea!Thanks, Merci, Danke Muchas gracias!Judges from HellIn Russian PYCCKAR BEPCNRHunger Strike for Justice !Huelga de Hambre hasta cantar...Victoria !Nicht Ohne Meine Tochter UK !!A smiling girl..she wasDesobediencia Civil DisobedienceThe English Holocaust 1902 and on in 2008!Why Divorcing in England is a "longlife Tragedy"Epilogue, EpilogoComing to England with children.Stop and read thisSupport

Not without my daughter UK


Please read more about ..................Family Legal System in the United Kingdom

or.........." The Children-Cartel in the UK " as it should be rename ....

Contact


Related Domains

Warning: Neither of the links below sharesmy views or comments, They are totally independent operated. I think is worth visiting.

Fassit.co.uk
legalsurvival.co.uk
Stopinjusticenow.com
mothers-for-justice.net
mothers4justice.com
bbc.co.uk/action network.co.uk
forced-adoptions.com
women-timesonline.co.uk
dekcuf.co.uk
childrencarteluk.com
notwithoutmydaughter.com

External Links



Rating: 0 - 0 votes

Company Name

Company Contact

Website Analysis

Domain Whois

Powered by who.is

Page Type

This page is about a company.

Retrieved from "http://aboutus.com/index.php?title=ExiledMothers.co.uk&oldid=14670450"