Difference between revisions of "LaptopPolicy:Status/TakKendrick"

(major shirt)
 

(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)



Line 1: Line 1:
 
<noinclude>< [[LaptopPolicy]]
 
<noinclude>< [[LaptopPolicy]]
 
</noinclude>([[AboutUsStaff]])
 
</noinclude>([[AboutUsStaff]])
: {{NotYet}} I think that this is part of a larger problem and realize the Kasey probably is saying it best in her concerns: Are the needs of the whole staff suited with this policy, or does it really only effect one set of our staff (ie those that didn't already buy their own laptops)?
+
: {{Abstain}} The policy is certainly a lot simpler and clearer. Since this now no longer affects me in any way what so ever, I'm creating a new status for myself -- "Abstain". I'm content to watch if any other shifts to the document occur (and might change my status at that time), but don't want to be a gating factor on this right now and shouldn't be counted in the tallies pro or con at this point. {{EditIcon|LaptopPolicy:Status/TakKendrick}}
 
+
:: It would still be great to have your thoughts, but "abstain" is ok too - RK
:In Portland we've all bought our own machines and have been using these for over a year, in Lahore it appears that the company has provided workstations (I could be wrong about this) but the staff there would like to have laptops. I feel we have completely different needs technologically (and we probably don't even know the landscape of what all these needs are); we need a policy/plan that addresses all of these instead of just one set of needs that doesn't apply to the other half of the staff.
 
 
 
:We're a creative company full of creative ideas, what I'm looking for/hoping for here is some sort of "out of the box" solution that suits a variety of needs instead of "band aids" that only address some users concerns. {{EditIcon|LaptopPolicy:Status/TakKendrick}}
 
 
 
  
 
<div class="NavHead" style="padding-left:1em; background:#F5E10F;">Discussion</div>
 
<div class="NavHead" style="padding-left:1em; background:#F5E10F;">Discussion</div>
 
<div class="NavContent">
 
<div class="NavContent">
  
Tak, just to make sure our understanding of your concerns is correct, your main concerns are that:
+
Comments and discussion related to my previous stance (re: health insurance) can be viewed in the [http://www.aboutus.org/index.php?title=LaptopPolicy:Status/TakKendrick&oldid=11798479 history]; they were taken out of this document because they've all been resolved or proven moot under the new policy.
# Some Employee Benefits are more important or just as important - but they are not being attended to - than LaptopPolicy e.g. health insurance.
 
# If the company has resources to address only one of these issues, health benefits should be the first priority.
 
# You are willing to say "Yes" if the company caters to the other Employee benefits as well.
 
<hr>
 
Tak, have you seen the following tasks/projects:
 
 
 
* [[Employee Benefits]]
 
* [[Medical Plan Selection]]
 
* [[Benefits Consensus Poll]]
 
 
 
[[Medical Plan Selection]] is on the current iteration for [[:Category:OperationsTask|Operations Tasks]], and [[Benefits Consensus Poll]] is on the iteration Plan for October 16-31. Do these address some of your concerns?
 
 
 
=== Major shift ===
 
Ray changed the document today. Check it out and update your status/note? peace, [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 10:28, 18 October 2007 (PDT)
 
 
</div>
 
</div>

Latest revision as of 04:54, 28 October 2007

Abstain The policy is certainly a lot simpler and clearer. Since this now no longer affects me in any way what so ever, I'm creating a new status for myself -- "Abstain". I'm content to watch if any other shifts to the document occur (and might change my status at that time), but don't want to be a gating factor on this right now and shouldn't be counted in the tallies pro or con at this point. Edit-chalk-10bo12.png edit

It would still be great to have your thoughts, but "abstain" is ok too - RK


Retrieved from "http://aboutus.com/index.php?title=LaptopPolicy:Status/TakKendrick&oldid=12051953"