Keep Unreviewed Low/December2007.1
Reviewers
Kasey, Obed, Asad, Mark, TedErnst, Bryan Daugherty add yourself here
What is this?
- Keeping unpatrolled recent changes under at a realistically low level throughout the next two weeks
Why we are doing this
- To ensure that all edits are constructive in nature, so that less vandalism is seen by readers.
We are done when
- Unpatrolled edits stay under control, during the week unpatrolled edits don't get above 3,000 mark from Tuesday to Saturday (GMT) and above 5,000 on Sunday and Monday.
Steps to get to DoneDone for this iteration
- Keeping unpatrolled RC count low, while ensuring that all edits and reviews are constructive.
- Looking for edits that can help our core customer in gaining visibility and credibility. For instance, weeding out non-constructive reviews, and adding reviews (that can be made constructive through refactoring) to the list of reviews that need refactoring.
- Moving our core customer one step closer to a wiki transformation by nominating pages for FeatureMePotentials and interacting with the contributors.
- There are some activities we've been doing in the context of reviewing that may not be worth doing. Thoughts?
- tagging parking lots
- tagging "no website"
- more like these?
Useful Links
- RecentChanges patrol (need to move to RecentChanges PeerReview
- [1]
Discussion
- Total aside: Hopefully in adding some structure and accountability, we'll have time to actually learn something from this process: notice new users, have time to note if there are there certain industries, locations- RC is, well, a lot of things, including a barometer of the site and how it is being used. Kasey 12:48, 18 September 2007 (PDT)
