PeerReview
Contents
Proposal
To have full community involvement in maintaining site quality, because a small handful of paid people can't do it by giving people the tools that this site currently has.
- Auto patrolled, a user group which has auto patrols edits, meaning that the persons edits are automatically deemed constructive and not needing review of each one.
- Site reviewers - gives auto patrolled folks an extra tools to help with maintaining site quality, i.e to deem an edit constructive
- InterWiki - people who are interested in linking the wiki world in AboutUs by maintianing the InterWiki table
- System Administrator (sysop) continues to have the ability to change people to give people rights. (plus more)
- Beurocrats
Discussion
Currently this is called RecentChanges patrol - there is some movement to get away from the patrolling "bad" edits ideology and to review peer edits.
pros/cons for deletion ability
pros
- category pages
- junk pages
- request for deletion
- adult images
- deletion log can be a way to monitor this as well as recent changes and would be auto patrolled.
cons
- it's concerning when a non trafficked page can be deleted with virtually no oversight
- by needing to check deletion log and recent changes it is creating more work.
- it is an action that doesn't show up on a watched list.
- deletion is not a fundamental issue for the site currently
Do we (the royal community we) agree?
- Please indicate YES or NotYet below and when we have a clear consensus, we can act on it.
- Ted: NotYet We're not done refactoring yet.
- Mark: NotYet