GetToKnowPreviousFeatures - Revision history

TedErnst: this isn't happening

2008-02-05T18:56:00Z

this isn't happening

Kasey: /* Discussion */ add to the discussion

2007-10-29T22:32:51Z

‎Discussion: add to the discussion

TakKendrick: New task

2007-10-09T21:20:44Z

New task

New page

<noinclude><big>{{CommunityHeader}}</noinclude>{{CommunityTask
|name = GetToKnowPreviousFeatures
|pairdays = ??
|who = [[TakKendrick|Tak]]}}<noinclude></big>

== People working on this ==
Everyone involved in the [[NurtureNominees]] process.

==Description==

This task really is about becoming familiar with some of the past [[featured|Featured WikiPages]] so that in helping [[NurtureNominees]] we can point out various "example" pages that illuminate points and ideas for improvements.

==How does this build community?==
In answering some [[FeatureMePotentials]] today it occured to me ([[TakKendrick|Tak]]) that I'm at a significant advantage in that I know of various "sample" pages to help illuminate ways to improve pages. [[GetToKnowPreviousFeatures]] is a way of sharing this knowledge. We should all start having a "toolbox" of good pages we like so:

* we can help the community build better [[WikiPages]]
* we can all start getting a feel for what makes up a great, feature-worthy page.

''(Take a look at my notes on [[DiscoverPune.com/FeatureDiscussion]] to see what I mean by providing example pages, while we don't always need to cite examples, sometimes it's more appropriate than just saying, "Hey, you need some testimonials and a few more images.")''

==Done When==
* A list of 50 or so "good examples" have been built. This list will just be the names of pages to start with.
* Team members will then take a few minutes each day to look at a page on the list, and then note reasons on that list as to what makes this an extraordinary [[WikiPage]].
* DoneDone is achieved when everyone has become familiar with these pages, and we start seeing this familiarity (ie. citing examples) cropping up in the various "Feature Discussion" for current/new nominees.

==Useful Links==

==Discussion==

[[Category:CurrentCommunityTasks]]
</noinclude>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<noinclude><big>{{CommunityHeader}}</noinclude>{{CommunityTask
+<noinclude><big>{{CommunityHeader}}</noinclude>{{CompletedCommunityTask
 |name = GetToKnowPreviousFeatures
 |pairdays = ??
@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 Obviousy there is lot of great, rich  content in the previously featured category. It would be interesting to gauge how featuring has helped to build community and examine retention, community building rates of previously featured wiki pages. I am not even sure this can be measured, or if so how this would be done. The question is how long does the relationship post actually being featured endure and how it grows into promoting community? How can we deepen the level of engagement? [[User:Kasey|Kasey]] 15:32, 29 October 2007 (PDT)
 </noinclude>

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 ==Discussion==
+Obviousy there is lot of great, rich  content in the previously featured category. It would be interesting to gauge how featuring has helped to build community and examine retention, community building rates of previously featured wiki pages. I am not even sure this can be measured, or if so how this would be done. The question is how long does the relationship post actually being featured endure and how it grows into promoting community? How can we deepen the level of engagement? [[User:Kasey|Kasey]] 15:32, 29 October 2007 (PDT)
 [[Category:CurrentCommunityTasks]]
 </noinclude>