3DN Whole System Design Process - Revision history

WikiSysop: migration import

2013-11-11T20:35:35Z

migration import

David Braden at 18:18, 25 January 2011

2011-01-25T18:18:08Z

David Braden at 13:05, 28 September 2007

2007-09-28T13:05:04Z

David Braden at 13:03, 28 September 2007

2007-09-28T13:03:38Z

David Braden at 12:57, 28 September 2007

2007-09-28T12:57:15Z

David Braden at 12:56, 28 September 2007

2007-09-28T12:56:06Z

David Braden at 17:45, 16 August 2007

2007-08-16T17:45:31Z

David Braden: New page: '''Whole System Design Process''' ::I have been thinking about these issues for a long time. How can human beings survive without destroying the environment? ::I have come to the followi...

2007-08-15T21:44:56Z

New page: '''Whole System Design Process''' ::I have been thinking about these issues for a long time. How can human beings survive without destroying the environment? ::I have come to the followi...

New page

'''Whole System Design Process'''

::I have been thinking about these issues for a long time. How can human beings survive without destroying the environment?

::I have come to the following conclusions:

:::1.The standard business model seeks to minimize complexity. "Do one thing and do it well". Build a better mouse trap, streamline production, marketing and distribution, grow to achieve economies of scale, and maximize profits. If your competitor can do it cheaper it drives you into bankruptcy. My thought is that there is a better, and sustainable, way to do business.

:::2.Modern agriculture has adopted the standard business model. Monocultures and raising animals in factory like settings lowers costs, increases production. It also reduces the number of species that can live in agricultural areas and, for many farm products, produces more than can be consumed, requiring government subsidies and driving less efficient farmers out of the market.

::There is another approach with the potential to be more productive and certainly more stable:

:::1.Ecology teaches us that complexity increases productivity and stability. The more species living in a given space the more each contributes to the well being of the whole.

:::2.Where any given resource can be used for more than one purpose, ecomomies of complexity can be achieved.

:::3.The simple example is co-generation. If you are going to create heat to produce electricity, the remaining heat after the steam turns the turbine can be used for another purpose. Two outputs from the same input increase total production.

:::4.Rather than integrate a company vertically or horizontally, or some combination, it is possible to think of integrating spherically. To the extent possible, design systems that internally produce what is consumed. Each time you create a production/consumption cycle within the system, it is an energy loop or a feed back loop. The more loops you can design into the system, the more you can save in cash costs for shipping, middlemen etc. You create "economies of integration". Its also fun, sort of like designing a Rube Goldberg contraption.

:::5.I like designs that approach self-sufficiency. Ideally, once the system is in place (and paid for) no further interaction with other systems (the larger economy) would be required. In that ideal case, (Total spherical integration) the system would only interact with other systems when the interaction was highly profitable. (Why work harder than you need to unless its going to be worth your while). As a practical matter, we are probably talking about a partial spherical integration with a component that offers goods and services to others in order to purchase those goods and services that cannot be produced internally.

:::6.Another reason to design for sale of goods and services is the possibility for growth. Profitable interactions in the larger economy allow the system to acquire new resources and expand production capacity. Profit would also create the possibility for reproducing (franchising) the system into new locations.

:::7.I talk about the elements of spherical design at The theory of relationships.

:::8.In a "whole" "balanced" system, all producers are also consumers and everything that is produced is also consumed. Such is an ecosystem prior to human intervention. All life dies and is recycled into new life through decay.

:::9.For the first ___ billion years of life on earth, there was an imbalanced system in which the waste product of certain algea (oxygen) was poisonous to the prevailing bacterial life forms. Life evolved to create creatures that would utilize this waste product (animals) and close the production loop with consumption.

:::10.A sustainable system is a whole balanced system. Design is easier at smaller scales with less complexity. Designing for space for "natural" systems to do their own thing simplifies design. Nature will arrange itself and we need only look to avoiding waste through cycling waste.

Back to [[3DN Collapse|Collapse]]

Back to [[3DN Introduction|Introduction]]

Back to [[3DN Table of Contents|Table of Contents]]

==Comments==

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 :::6. Another reason to design for sale of goods and services is the possibility for growth. Profitable interactions in the larger economy allow the system to acquire new resources and expand production capacity. Profit would also create the possibility for reproducing (franchising) the system into new locations.
-:::7. I talk about the elements of spherical design at [[3DN The Theory of Relationships|the theory of relationships]].
+:::7. I talk about the elements of spherical design at [[3DN Theory of Relationships|the theory of relationships]].
 :::8. In a "whole" "balanced" system, all producers are also consumers and everything that is produced is also consumed. Such is an ecosystem prior to human intervention. All life dies and is recycled into new life through decay.

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 :::6. Another reason to design for sale of goods and services is the possibility for growth. Profitable interactions in the larger economy allow the system to acquire new resources and expand production capacity. Profit would also create the possibility for reproducing (franchising) the system into new locations.
-:::7. I talk about the elements of spherical design at The theory of relationships.
+:::7. I talk about the elements of spherical design at [[3DN The Theory of Relationships|the theory of relationships]].
 :::8. In a "whole" "balanced" system, all producers are also consumers and everything that is produced is also consumed. Such is an ecosystem prior to human intervention. All life dies and is recycled into new life through decay.

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 :::1. Ecology teaches us that complexity increases productivity and stability. The more species living in a given space the more each contributes to the well being of the whole.
-:::2. Where any given resource can be used for more than one purpose, economies of complexity, [[3DN Sustainable Systems]] can be achieved.
+:::2. Where any given resource can be used for more than one purpose, economies of complexity, [[3DN Integrated Production|Economies of Integration]] can be achieved.
 :::3. The simple example is co-generation. If you are going to create heat to produce electricity, the remaining heat after the steam turns the turbine can be used for another purpose. Two outputs from the same input increase total production.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 16 August 2007
Line 30:		Line 30:

	:::10.A sustainable system is a whole balanced system. Design is easier at smaller scales with less complexity. Designing for space for "natural" systems to do their own thing simplifies design. Nature will arrange itself and we need only look to avoiding waste through cycling waste.		:::10.A sustainable system is a whole balanced system. Design is easier at smaller scales with less complexity. Designing for space for "natural" systems to do their own thing simplifies design. Nature will arrange itself and we need only look to avoiding waste through cycling waste.
		+
		+	Back to [[3DN examples\|Examples]]

	Back to [[3DN Collapse\|Collapse]]		Back to [[3DN Collapse\|Collapse]]

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:35, 11 November 2013
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:18, 25 January 2011
(No difference)

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 ::I have come to the following conclusions:
-:::1.The standard business model seeks to minimize complexity. "Do one thing and do it well". Build a better mouse trap, streamline production, marketing and distribution, grow to achieve economies of scale, and maximize profits. If your competitor can do it cheaper it drives you into bankruptcy. My thought is that there is a better, and sustainable, way to do business.
+:::1. The standard business model seeks to minimize complexity. "Do one thing and do it well". Build a better mouse trap, streamline production, marketing and distribution, grow to achieve economies of scale, and maximize profits. If your competitor can do it cheaper it drives you into bankruptcy. My thought is that there is a better, and sustainable, way to do business.
-:::2.Modern agriculture has adopted the standard business model. Monocultures and raising animals in factory like settings lowers costs, increases production. It also reduces the number of species that can live in agricultural areas and, for many farm products, produces more than can be consumed, requiring government subsidies and driving less efficient farmers out of the market.
+:::2. Modern agriculture has adopted the standard business model. Monocultures and raising animals in factory like settings lowers costs, increases production. It also reduces the number of species that can live in agricultural areas and, for many farm products, produces more than can be consumed, requiring government subsidies and driving less efficient farmers out of the market.
 ::There is another approach with the potential to be more productive and certainly more stable:
-:::1.Ecology teaches us that complexity increases productivity and stability. The more species living in a given space the more each contributes to the well being of the whole.
+:::1. Ecology teaches us that complexity increases productivity and stability. The more species living in a given space the more each contributes to the well being of the whole.
-:::2.Where any given resource can be used for more than one purpose, ecomomies of complexity can be achieved.
+:::2. Where any given resource can be used for more than one purpose, economies of complexity, [[3DN Sustainable Systems]] can be achieved.
-:::3.The simple example is co-generation. If you are going to create heat to produce electricity, the remaining heat after the steam turns the turbine can be used for another purpose. Two outputs from the same input increase total production.
+:::3. The simple example is co-generation. If you are going to create heat to produce electricity, the remaining heat after the steam turns the turbine can be used for another purpose. Two outputs from the same input increase total production.
-:::4.Rather than integrate a company vertically or horizontally, or some combination, it is possible to think of integrating spherically. To the extent possible, design systems that internally produce what is consumed. Each time you create a production/consumption cycle within the system, it is an energy loop or a feed back loop. The more loops you can design into the system, the more you can save in cash costs for shipping, middlemen etc. You create "economies of integration". Its also fun, sort of like designing a Rube Goldberg contraption.
+:::4. Rather than integrate a company vertically or horizontally, or some combination, it is possible to think of integrating spherically. To the extent possible, design systems that internally produce what is consumed. Each time you create a production/consumption cycle within the system, it is an energy loop or a feed back loop. The more loops you can design into the system, the more you can save in cash costs for shipping, middlemen etc. You create "economies of integration". Its also fun, sort of like designing a Rube Goldberg contraption.
-:::5.I like designs that approach self-sufficiency. Ideally, once the system is in place (and paid for) no further interaction with other systems (the larger economy) would be required. In that ideal case, (Total spherical integration) the system would only interact with other systems when the interaction was highly profitable. (Why work harder than you need to unless its going to be worth your while). As a practical matter, we are probably talking about a partial spherical integration with a component that offers goods and services to others in order to purchase those goods and services that cannot be produced internally.
+:::5. I like designs that approach self-sufficiency. Ideally, once the system is in place (and paid for) no further interaction with other systems (the larger economy) would be required. In that ideal case, (Total spherical integration) the system would only interact with other systems when the interaction was highly profitable. (Why work harder than you need to unless its going to be worth your while). As a practical matter, we are probably talking about a partial spherical integration with a component that offers goods and services to others in order to purchase those goods and services that cannot be produced internally.
-:::6.Another reason to design for sale of goods and services is the possibility for growth. Profitable interactions in the larger economy allow the system to acquire new resources and expand production capacity. Profit would also create the possibility for reproducing (franchising) the system into new locations.
+:::6. Another reason to design for sale of goods and services is the possibility for growth. Profitable interactions in the larger economy allow the system to acquire new resources and expand production capacity. Profit would also create the possibility for reproducing (franchising) the system into new locations.
-:::7.I talk about the elements of spherical design at The theory of relationships.
+:::7. I talk about the elements of spherical design at The theory of relationships.
-:::8.In a "whole" "balanced" system, all producers are also consumers and everything that is produced is also consumed. Such is an ecosystem prior to human intervention. All life dies and is recycled into new life through decay.
+:::8. In a "whole" "balanced" system, all producers are also consumers and everything that is produced is also consumed. Such is an ecosystem prior to human intervention. All life dies and is recycled into new life through decay.
-:::9.For the first ___ billion years of life on earth, there was an imbalanced system in which the waste product of certain algea (oxygen) was poisonous to the prevailing bacterial life forms. Life evolved to create creatures that would utilize this waste product (animals) and close the production loop with consumption.
+:::9. For the first ___ billion years of life on earth, there was an imbalanced system in which the waste product of certain algea (oxygen) was poisonous to the prevailing bacterial life forms. Life evolved to create creatures that would utilize this waste product (animals) and close the production loop with consumption.
-:::10.A sustainable system is a whole balanced system. Design is easier at smaller scales with less complexity. Designing for space for "natural" systems to do their own thing simplifies design. Nature will arrange itself and we need only look to avoiding waste through cycling waste.
+:::10. A sustainable system is a whole balanced system. Design is easier at smaller scales with less complexity. Designing for space for "natural" systems to do their own thing simplifies design. Nature will arrange itself and we need only look to avoiding waste through cycling waste.
 Back to [[3DN examples|Examples]]